Trial reportEuropean radiology2014
MRI screening for silicone breast implant rupture: accuracy, inter- and intraobserver variability using explantation results as reference standard.
Trial report in European radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrospective study on the strength of magnetic resonance signs for predicting breast implant rupture: assessing the impact of radiologist expertise at a breast cancer referral center.La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- Current State of Evidence-Based Long-Term Monitoring Protocols for Breast Plastic Surgery Patients.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Ultrasound versus MRI for evaluation of silicone leakage from silicone breast implants.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Imaging of the Reconstructed Breast.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Topical silicone gel mistaken for a retained orbital foreign body on MRI.BMJ case reports · 2022Article
- Silicone nipple discharge: A case report of an unusual presentation of breast implant rupture.International journal of surgery case reports · 2020Article
- The clinical implications of poly implant prothèse breast implants: an overview.Archives of plastic surgery · 2015Review
- PIP breast implants: rupture rate and correlation with breast cancer.Il Giornale di chirurgiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe recall of Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) silicone breast implants in 2010 resulted in large numbers of asymptomatic women with implants who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening. This study's aim was to assess the accuracy and interobserver variability of MRI screening in the detection of rupture and extracapsular silicone leakage.
methodsA prospective study included 107 women with 214 PIP implants who underwent explantation preceded by MRI. In 2013, two radiologists blinded for previous MRI findings or outcome at surgery, independently re-evaluated all MRI examinations. A structured protocol described the MRI findings. The ex vivo findings served as reference standard.
resultsIn 208 of the 214 explanted prostheses, radiologists agreed independently about the condition of the implants. In five of the six cases they disagreed (2.6 %), but subsequently reached consensus. A sensitivity of 93 %, specificity of 93 %, positive predictive value of 77 % and negative predictive value of 98 % was found. The interobserver agreement was excellent (kappa value of 0.92).
conclusionsMRI has a high accuracy in diagnosing rupture in silicone breast implants. Considering the high kappa value of interobserver agreement, MRI appears to be a consistent diagnostic test. A simple, uniform classification, may improve communication between radiologist and plastic surgeon. KEY POINTS: MRI has a high accuracy in diagnosing rupture in silicone breast implants. MRI appears to be a consistent diagnostic test with excellent interobserver agreement. A simple, uniform classification system, improves communication between radiologist and plastic surgeon. The interobserver agreement on implant rupture is higher than on extracapsular leakage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24599622What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.