ReviewJournal of computer-aided molecular design2014
The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview.
Review in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
108 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward an AI Era: Application of Artificial Intelligence in Inclusion Complex Screening.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Binding Free Energies without Alchemy.ArXiv · 2026Article
- LamNet: an alchemical-path-aware graph neural network to accelerate binding free energy calculations for drug discovery and beyond.National science review · 2026Article
- Solvation Free Energies of Drug-like Molecules via Fast Growth in an Explicit Solvent: Assessment of the AM1-BCC, RESP/HF/6-31G*, RESP-QM/MM, and ABCG2 Fixed-Charge Approaches.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Computation of Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energies with a Quantum Mechanics-Based Mining Minima Algorithm.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Expanded ensemble predictions of toluene-water partition coefficients in the SAMPL9 logPhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2025Article
- Host-Guest Binding Free Energies à la Carte: An Automated OneOPES Protocol.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Calculation of protein-ligand binding entropies using a rule-based molecular fingerprint.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- The Open Force Field Initiative: Open Software and Open Science for Molecular Modeling.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- Replica Exchange of Expanded Ensembles: A Generalized Ensemble Approach with Enhanced Flexibility and Parallelizability.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- The Fe-MAN Challenge: Ferrates-Microkinetic Assessment of Numerical Quantum Chemistry.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2024Article
- The SAMPL9 host-guest blind challenge: an overview of binding free energy predictive accuracy.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2024Article
- Tuning Potential Functions to Host-Guest Binding Data.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Expanded ensemble predictions of absolute binding free energies in the SAMPL9 host-guest challenge.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2023Article
- The temperature-dependence of host-guest binding thermodynamics: experimental and simulation studies.Chemical science · 2023Article
- Scalable hybrid deep neural networks/polarizable potentials biomolecular simulations including long-range effects.Chemical science · 2023Article
- Solvated interaction energy: from small-molecule to antibody drug design.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Review
- An overview of the SAMPL8 host-guest binding challenge.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2022Article
- Obtaining QM/MM binding free energies in the SAMPL8 drugs of abuse challenge: indirect approaches.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2022Article
- SAMPL7 protein-ligand challenge: A community-wide evaluation of computational methods against fragment screening and pose-prediction.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2022Article
48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prospective validation of methods for computing binding affinities can help assess their predictive power and thus set reasonable expectations for their performance in drug design applications. Supramolecular host-guest systems are excellent model systems for testing such affinity prediction methods, because their small size and limited conformational flexibility, relative to proteins, allows higher throughput and better numerical convergence. The SAMPL4 prediction challenge therefore included a series of host-guest systems, based on two hosts, cucurbit[7]uril and octa-acid. Binding affinities in aqueous solution were measured experimentally for a total of 23 guest molecules. Participants submitted 35 sets of computational predictions for these host-guest systems, based on methods ranging from simple docking, to extensive free energy simulations, to quantum mechanical calculations. Over half of the predictions provided better correlations with experiment than two simple null models, but most methods underperformed the null models in terms of root mean squared error and linear regression slope. Interestingly, the overall performance across all SAMPL4 submissions was similar to that for the prior SAMPL3 host-guest challenge, although the experimentalists took steps to simplify the current challenge. While some methods performed fairly consistently across both hosts, no single approach emerged as consistent top performer, and the nonsystematic nature of the various submissions made it impossible to draw definitive conclusions regarding the best choices of energy models or sampling algorithms. Salt effects emerged as an issue in the calculation of absolute binding affinities of cucurbit[7]uril-guest systems, but were not expected to affect the relative affinities significantly. Useful directions for future rounds of the challenge might involve encouraging participants to carry out some calculations that replicate each others' studies, and to systematically explore parameter options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.