Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24599478›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Comparison of bacterial communities in sands and water at beaches with bacterial water quality violations.

Elizabeth Halliday, Sandra L McLellan, Linda A Amaral-Zettler, Mitchell L Sogin, Rebecca J Gast

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. U.S. Recreational Water Quality Criteria: A Vision for the Future.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth HallidayBiology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Sandra L McLellanSchool of Freshwater Sciences, Great Lakes Water Institute, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Linda A Amaral-ZettlerJosephine Bay Paul Center, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, United States of America; Department of Geosciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.
Mitchell L SoginJosephine Bay Paul Center, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Rebecca J GastBiology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Marine Biological Laboratory · USWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · US

Funding

Woods Hole Center for Oceans and Human HealthP50ES012742 · NIEHS · WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION · PI STEGEMAN, JOHN J · 2004 to 2009
$2.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS P0ES012742NIEHS NIH HHS P50 ES012742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recreational water quality, as measured by culturable fecal indicator bacteria (FIB), may be influenced by persistent populations of these bacteria in local sands or wrack, in addition to varied fecal inputs from human and/or animal sources. In this study, pyrosequencing was used to generate short sequence tags of the 16S hypervariable region ribosomal DNA from shallow water samples and from sand samples collected at the high tide line and at the intertidal water line at sites with and without FIB exceedance events. These data were used to examine the sand and water bacterial communities to assess the similarity between samples, and to determine the impact of water quality exceedance events on the community composition. Sequences belonging to a group of bacteria previously identified as alternative fecal indicators were also analyzed in relationship to water quality violation events. We found that sand and water samples hosted distinctly different overall bacterial communities, and there was greater similarity in the community composition between coastal water samples from two distant sites. The dissimilarity between high tide and intertidal sand bacterial communities, although more similar to each other than to water, corresponded to greater tidal range between the samples. Within the group of alternative fecal indicators greater similarity was observed within sand and water from the same site, likely reflecting the anthropogenic contribution at each beach. This study supports the growing evidence that community-based molecular tools can be leveraged to identify the sources and potential impact of fecal pollution in the environment, and furthermore suggests that a more diverse bacterial community in beach sand and water may reflect a less contaminated site and better water quality.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyWater MicrobiologyWater QualityAnimalsBacteriaBase SequenceBathing BeachesBiodiversityCaliforniaEnvironmental MonitoringFecesHumansMassachusettsPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID24599478
PMCPMC3944938
OpenAlexW2118085183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.