Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24599224›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Rapid point-of-care breath test for biomarkers of breast cancer and abnormal mammograms.

Michael Phillips, J David Beatty, Renee N Cataneo, Jan Huston, Peter D Kaplan, Roy I Lalisang, Philippe Lambin, Marc B I Lobbes, Mayur Mundada, Nadine Pappas and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04755829 (Breath Test to Predict Breast Cancer and Outcome of Mammography), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04755829 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Breath Test to Predict Breast Cancer and Outcome of Mammography

TypeobservationalSponsorMenssana Research, Inc.Ran2021 to 2023Enrolled1,000ConditionsBreast Cancer, Abnormal Mammogram, UnspecifiedArmsBreathX test for breath VOCs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Wearables and the medical revolution.Personalized medicine · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael PhillipsBreath Research Laboratory, Menssana Research Inc., Newark, New Jersey, United States of America; Department of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, United States of America.
J David BeattySwedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Renee N CataneoBreath Research Laboratory, Menssana Research Inc., Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.
Jan HustonHackensackUMC Mountainside, Montclair, New Jersey, United States of America.
Peter D KaplanBreath Research Laboratory, Menssana Research Inc., Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.
Roy I LalisangDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Philippe LambinDepartment of Radiotherapy (MAASTRO), GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marc B I LobbesDepartment of Radiology, GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Mayur MundadaBreath Research Laboratory, Menssana Research Inc., Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.
Nadine PappasSaint Michael's Medical Center, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.
Urvish PatelBreath Research Laboratory, Menssana Research Inc., Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.
Menssana Research (United States) · USMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLHackensack University Medical Center Mountainside · USSaint Michael's Medical Center · USSwedish Medical Center · US

Funding

POINT-OF-CARE BREATH TEST FOR DISEASESR43RR030689 · NCRR · MENSSANA RESEARCH, INC. · PI PHILLIPS, MICHAEL · 2010 to 2010
$102k
NCRR NIH HHS 1R43RR030689-01NCRR NIH HHS R43 RR030689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have reported volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in breath as biomarkers of breast cancer and abnormal mammograms, apparently resulting from increased oxidative stress and cytochrome p450 induction. We evaluated a six-minute point-of-care breath test for VOC biomarkers in women screened for breast cancer at centers in the USA and the Netherlands.

methods244 women had a screening mammogram (93/37 normal/abnormal) or a breast biopsy (cancer/no cancer 35/79). A mobile point-of-care system collected and concentrated breath and air VOCs for analysis with gas chromatography and surface acoustic wave detection. Chromatograms were segmented into a time series of alveolar gradients (breath minus room air). Segmental alveolar gradients were ranked as candidate biomarkers by C-statistic value (area under curve [AUC] of receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve). Multivariate predictive algorithms were constructed employing significant biomarkers identified with multiple Monte Carlo simulations and cross validated with a leave-one-out (LOO) procedure.

resultsPerformance of breath biomarker algorithms was determined in three groups: breast cancer on biopsy versus normal screening mammograms (81.8% sensitivity, 70.0% specificity, accuracy 79% (73% on LOO) [C-statistic value], negative predictive value 99.9%); normal versus abnormal screening mammograms (86.5% sensitivity, 66.7% specificity, accuracy 83%, 62% on LOO); and cancer versus no cancer on breast biopsy (75.8% sensitivity, 74.0% specificity, accuracy 78%, 67% on LOO).

conclusionsA pilot study of a six-minute point-of-care breath test for volatile biomarkers accurately identified women with breast cancer and with abnormal mammograms. Breath testing could potentially reduce the number of needless mammograms without loss of diagnostic sensitivity.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsBreath TestsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastFemaleHumansMammographyMonte Carlo MethodMultivariate AnalysisPoint-of-Care SystemsROC CurveYoung AdultBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID24599224
PMCPMC3943910
OpenAlexW2068765343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.