Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24599090›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

White-tailed deer vigilance: the influence of social and environmental factors.

Marcus A Lashley, M Colter Chitwood, Michael T Biggerstaff, Daniel L Morina, Christopher E Moorman, Christopher S DePerno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gouldian Finches (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Differential weighting of lion vocalizations and oxpecker alarm calls in giraffes.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  20. Neonate personality affects early-life resource acquisition in a large social mammal.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcus A LashleyDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
M Colter ChitwoodDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Michael T BiggerstaffDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Daniel L MorinaDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Christopher E MoormanDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Christopher S DePernoDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vigilance behavior may directly affect fitness of prey animals, and understanding factors influencing vigilance may provide important insight into predator-prey interactions. We used 40,540 pictures taken withcamera traps in August 2011 and 2012to evaluate factors influencing individual vigilance behavior of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) while foraging at baited sites. We used binary logistic regression to determine if individual vigilance was affected by age, sex, and group size. Additionally, we evaluated whether the time of the day,moon phase,and presence of other non-predatorwildlife species impacted individual vigilance. Juveniles were 11% less vigilant at baited sites than adults. Females were 46% more vigilant when fawns were present. Males and females spent more time feeding as group size increased, but with each addition of 1 individual to a group, males increased feeding time by nearly double that of females. Individual vigilance fluctuated with time of day andwith moon phase but generally was least during diurnal and moonlit nocturnal hours, indicating deer have the ability to adjust vigilance behavior to changing predation risk associated with varyinglight intensity.White-tailed deer increased individual vigilance when other non-predator wildlife were present. Our data indicate that differential effects of environmental and social constraints on vigilance behavior between sexes may encourage sexual segregation in white-tailed deer.

Indexed as

EnvironmentSocial BehaviorAnimalsDeerFemaleLogistic ModelsMaleMoonNorth CarolinaPredatory BehaviorTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24599090
PMCPMC3945222
OpenAlexW2060474296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.