Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24598886›Full record

Observational studyThe Journal of nutrition2014

Vitamin D intake determines vitamin d status of postmenopausal women, particularly those with limited sun exposure.

Ting-Yuan David Cheng, Amy E Millen, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Shirley A A Beresford, Andrea Z LaCroix, Yingye Zheng, Gary E Goodman, Mark D Thornquist, Marian L Neuhouser

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Journal of nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ting-Yuan David ChengPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Amy E Millen
Jean Wactawski-Wende
Shirley A A Beresford
Andrea Z LaCroix
Yingye Zheng
Gary E Goodman
Mark D Thornquist
Marian L Neuhouser
University of Washington · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

PHS HHS HHSN268201100001CPHS HHS HHSN268201100002CPHS HHS HHSN268201100003CPHS HHS HHSN268201100004CPHS HHS HHSN268201100046CPHS HHS HHSN271201100004C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few detailed data are available on the wide range of determinants of vitamin D status among postmenopausal women, and it is also unclear whether there may be undiscovered determinants. The objective of this study was to comprehensively evaluate determinants of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations in a large cohort of postmenopausal women. Data from a subset of the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study were analyzed (50-79 y; n = 3345). Information on diet, lifestyle behaviors, secondhand smoke, use of dietary supplements and medication, chronic diseases, and anthropometry was collected at baseline (1993-1998) and on sun exposure at year 4 follow-up. Linear regression was performed to estimate regression coefficients (β). Significant determinants were total vitamin D intake (food plus supplements per 100 IU/d, β = 2.08), years of supplemental vitamin D use (β = 0.15), total fat intake (grams per day, β = -0.03), smoking status (β = -2.64, current vs. never), regional solar irradiance (β = 6.26, 475-500 vs. 300-325 Langleys), daylight time spent outdoors in summer (β = 5.15, >2 h vs. <30 min/d), recreational physical activity (metabolic equivalent task per hour per week, β = 0.13), waist circumference (centimeters, β = -0.26), and race/ethnicity (β = -11.94, black vs. white). Total vitamin D intake (partial R(2) = 0.09) explained the most variance in serum 25(OH)D concentrations (total R(2) = 0.29). The association between total vitamin D intake and serum 25(OH)D concentrations was stronger among participants who spent less rather than more daylight time outdoors in summer (P-interaction = 0.026). History and medications for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and type 2 diabetes and secondhand smoke exposure were not associated with serum 25(OH)D. In conclusion, dietary factors and sun exposure remain important determinants of vitamin D status in postmenopausal women. Vitamin D intake should be emphasized for those with limited sun exposure.

Indexed as

SunlightAgedBlack PeopleDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansLife StyleLinear ModelsMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPostmenopauseSmokingSurveys and QuestionnairesVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyVitamins25-hydroxyvitamin DVitamin DVitamins

Identifiers

PMID24598886
PMCPMC3985825
OpenAlexW2112072908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.