Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24598547›Full record

ArticleNature2014

doublesex is a mimicry supergene.

K Kunte, W Zhang, A Tenger-Trolander, D H Palmer, A Martin, R D Reed, S P Mullen, M R Kronforst

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 172 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
172citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

172 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A century of theories of balancing selection.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Whole genome analysis of toxic Papilionidae butterflies utilizing aristolochic acid, Pachliopta aristolochiae, and Byasa alcinous.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The "Chameleon Ant"Ecology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  11. High-resolution single-cell analyses reveal evolutionary constraints and evolvability of sexual circuits inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Functional genetic elements of a butterfly mimicry supergene.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Ecology and sexual conflict drive the macroevolutionary dynamics of female-limited color polymorphisms in damselflies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. High-resolution comparative single-cell transcriptomics ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

112 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

K Kunte1] National Center for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru 560065, India [2].
W Zhang1] Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA [2].
A Tenger-TrolanderDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
D H PalmerCommittee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
A MartinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
R D ReedDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
S P MullenDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
M R Kronforst1] Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA [2] Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most striking examples of sexual dimorphism is sex-limited mimicry in butterflies, a phenomenon in which one sex--usually the female--mimics a toxic model species, whereas the other sex displays a different wing pattern. Sex-limited mimicry is phylogenetically widespread in the swallowtail butterfly genus Papilio, in which it is often associated with female mimetic polymorphism. In multiple polymorphic species, the entire wing pattern phenotype is controlled by a single Mendelian 'supergene'. Although theoretical work has explored the evolutionary dynamics of supergene mimicry, there are almost no empirical data that address the critical issue of what a mimicry supergene actually is at a functional level. Using an integrative approach combining genetic and association mapping, transcriptome and genome sequencing, and gene expression analyses, we show that a single gene, doublesex, controls supergene mimicry in Papilio polytes. This is in contrast to the long-held view that supergenes are likely to be controlled by a tightly linked cluster of loci. Analysis of gene expression and DNA sequence variation indicates that isoform expression differences contribute to the functional differences between dsx mimicry alleles, and protein sequence evolution may also have a role. Our results combine elements from different hypotheses for the identity of supergenes, showing that a single gene can switch the entire wing pattern among mimicry phenotypes but may require multiple, tightly linked mutations to do so.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsGenes, InsectSex CharacteristicsAllelesAnimalsButterfliesEvolution, MolecularFemaleGene Expression RegulationMaleMolecular MimicryMolecular Sequence DataMutationPhenotypePigmentationDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsDSX protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID24598547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.