ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2014
Encoding frequency contrast in primate auditory cortex.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cortical deviance detection represents a canonical difference signal.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Decoding of frequency-modulated sweeps by core and belt neurons in the alert macaque auditory cortex.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Temporally precise population coding of dynamic sounds by auditory cortex.Journal of neurophysiology · 2021Article
- Extracellular voltage thresholds for maximizing information extraction in primate auditory cortex: implications for a brain computer interface.Journal of neural engineering · 2021Article
- Experience-Dependent Coding of Time-Dependent Frequency Trajectories by Off Responses in Secondary Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Amplitude modulation coding in awake mice and squirrel monkeys.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Article
- Background noise exerts diverse effects on the cortical encoding of foreground sounds.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- Cluster-based analysis improves predictive validity of spike-triggered receptive field estimates.PloS one · 2017Article
- Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Auditory Cortical Frequency Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016Article
- Modulation-frequency-specific adaptation in awake auditory cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015Article
- Diverse cortical codes for scene segmentation in primate auditory cortex.Journal of neurophysiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Changes in amplitude and frequency jointly determine much of the communicative significance of complex acoustic signals, including human speech. We have previously described responses of neurons in the core auditory cortex of awake rhesus macaques to sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) signals. Here we report a complementary study of sinusoidal frequency modulation (SFM) in the same neurons. Responses to SFM were analogous to SAM responses in that changes in multiple parameters defining SFM stimuli (e.g., modulation frequency, modulation depth, carrier frequency) were robustly encoded in the temporal dynamics of the spike trains. For example, changes in the carrier frequency produced highly reproducible changes in shapes of the modulation period histogram, consistent with the notion that the instantaneous probability of discharge mirrors the moment-by-moment spectrum at low modulation rates. The upper limit for phase locking was similar across SAM and SFM within neurons, suggesting shared biophysical constraints on temporal processing. Using spike train classification methods, we found that neural thresholds for modulation depth discrimination are typically far lower than would be predicted from frequency tuning to static tones. This "dynamic hyperacuity" suggests a substantial central enhancement of the neural representation of frequency changes relative to the auditory periphery. Spike timing information was superior to average rate information when discriminating among SFM signals, and even when discriminating among static tones varying in frequency. This finding held even when differences in total spike count across stimuli were normalized, indicating both the primacy and generality of temporal response dynamics in cortical auditory processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.