Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2014
Gene editing of CCR5 in autologous CD4 T cells of persons infected with HIV.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00842634 (A Phase I Study of Autologous T-Cells Genetically Modified at the CCR5 Gene by Zinc Finger Nucleases SB-728 in HIV-Infected Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 719 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase I Study of Autologous T-Cells Genetically Modified at the CCR5 Gene by Zinc Finger Nucleases SB-728 in HIV-Infected Patients
Who cites it
719 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,335 citations in OpenAlex.
- The evolving landscape of gene editing therapies for human genetic diseases: a twenty-year bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- HLA-mismatched allogeneic adoptive immune therapy in patients with severely immunosuppressed AIDS: a multicenter, open-label, controlled, phase 2a study.Emerging microbes & infections · 2024Trial
- CCR5-edited CD4+ T cells augment HIV-specific immunity to enable post-rebound control of HIV replication.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2021Trial
- CCR5 Receptor Occupancy Analysis Reveals Increased Peripheral Blood CCR5+CD4+ T Cells Following Treatment With the Anti-CCR5 Antibody Leronlimab.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Trial
- CRISPR in clinical oncology: translational advances from molecular diagnostics to therapeutics.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Article
- CD4-directed nanoblades enable selective genome editing in CD4EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Article
- A modular γδ TCR-T platform combining KRAS pMHC targeting with re-dosable mRNA engager redirection.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Article
- HIV-specific and resistant CAR T cells promote control of HIV replication in people with HIV.Research square · 2026Article
- Advancing Antiviral Design: Integrating Natural Products, Computation and Targeted Delivery.Chemical biology & drug design · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- HIV-1 virome profiling using HIV-PULSE to guide therapeutic and curative interventions.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- Latent HIV Reservoirs in the Central Nervous System: Mechanisms, Barriers, and Therapeutic Approaches.ACS infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Biopharmaceuticals for Cancer Treatment: An Update.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- A precision gene-engineered B cell medicine producing sustained levels of active factor IX for hemophilia B therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026Article
- Gene Therapy and Gene Editing: Current Trends and Future Prospects of Molecular Medicine.Current gene therapy · 2026Review
- How Effective are Nanotechnology-Based Therapeutics to Treat Autoimmune Diseases.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Searching for a HIV-1 Cure.Theranostics · 2026Review
659 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
20 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCCR5 is the major coreceptor for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We investigated whether site-specific modification of the gene ("gene editing")--in this case, the infusion of autologous CD4 T cells in which the CCR5 gene was rendered permanently dysfunctional by a zinc-finger nuclease (ZFN)--is safe.
methodsWe enrolled 12 patients in an open-label, nonrandomized, uncontrolled study of a single dose of ZFN-modified autologous CD4 T cells. The patients had chronic aviremic HIV infection while they were receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy. Six of them underwent an interruption in antiretroviral treatment 4 weeks after the infusion of 10 billion autologous CD4 T cells, 11 to 28% of which were genetically modified with the ZFN. The primary outcome was safety as assessed by treatment-related adverse events. Secondary outcomes included measures of immune reconstitution and HIV resistance.
resultsOne serious adverse event was associated with infusion of the ZFN-modified autologous CD4 T cells and was attributed to a transfusion reaction. The median CD4 T-cell count was 1517 per cubic millimeter at week 1, a significant increase from the preinfusion count of 448 per cubic millimeter (P<0.001). The median concentration of CCR5-modified CD4 T cells at 1 week was 250 cells per cubic millimeter. This constituted 8.8% of circulating peripheral-blood mononuclear cells and 13.9% of circulating CD4 T cells. Modified cells had an estimated mean half-life of 48 weeks. During treatment interruption and the resultant viremia, the decline in circulating CCR5-modified cells (-1.81 cells per day) was significantly less than the decline in unmodified cells (-7.25 cells per day) (P=0.02). HIV RNA became undetectable in one of four patients who could be evaluated. The blood level of HIV DNA decreased in most patients.
conclusionsCCR5-modified autologous CD4 T-cell infusions are safe within the limits of this study. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00842634.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.