ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2014
Comparative Evaluation of Push-out Bond Strength of Three Endodontic Sealers with and without Amoxicillin-An Invitro Study.
Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of the impact of XP-Endo Finisher file on push-out bond strength of various endodontic sealers.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024Article
- Time-Dependent Effect of Chitosan Nanoparticles as Final Irrigation on the Apical Sealing Ability and Push-Out Bond Strength of Root Canal Obturation.International journal of dentistry · 2020Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Anti Microbial effects of Triple Antibiotic Paste and Amox and its derivatives againstJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2017Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Effect of Three Endodontic Sealers with and Without Antibiotics - An In-vitro Study.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the sealing ability of three different root canal sealers with and without amoxicillin, using a push-out bond strength test. MATERIAL AND
methodsSixty single-rooted extracted human teeth were used for this study. Each tooth was instrumented and irrigated with 5.25% Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% EDTA. The teeth were then divided into six test groups: Gutta percha (GP)/AH Plus (Dentsply, Germany), GP/AH Plus with 10% amoxicillin (TEVA Pharmaceuticals Sellersville, PA), GP/Pulp Canal Sealer EWT (Extended Working Time, SybronEndo Orange, CA), GP/Pulp Canal Sealer EWT with amoxicillin, GP/Apexit Plus, GP/Apexit Plus (Vivadent, Tulsa, US) with amoxicillin. After the sealer was set, the entire root was sectioned into 1 mm thick slices. A push-out bond strength test was performed by using a universal testing machine. The Student's t-test was used to compare the sealer bond strength within the specific sealer test groups and within each sealer at apical, middle and coronal root levels.
resultsThere was no significant difference between the groups within each sealer (p>0.05) with or without amoxicillin at the same root level.
conclusionThis study demonstrated that the addition of 10% by weight of amoxicillin does not significantly (p> 0.05) change the overall push-out bond strength of three endodontic sealers when compared at the apical, middle, and coronal tooth level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.