Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24596686›Full record

ArticleMuscles, ligaments and tendons journal2013

Muscle, Ligaments and Tendons Journal. Basic principles and recommendations in clinical and field science research.

Johnny Padulo, Francesco Oliva, Antonio Frizziero, Nicola Maffulli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Muscles, ligaments and tendons journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 176 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
176citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

176 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Research and Publication Ethics in Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Letter to the Editor concerning "Is the 4 mm height of the vertebral artery groove really a limitation of C1 pedicle screw insertion?" (by Da-Geng Huang, Si-Min He, Jun-Wei Pan, et al. Eur Spine J, 2014, 23(5):1109-1114).European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2014
    Article
  19. Letter to the Editor concerning "Calculation of corrected body height in idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of four methods" by M. Tyrakowski et al. (Eur Spine J, doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3275-1).European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2014
    Article
  20. How obesity modifies tendons (implications for athletic activities).Muscles, ligaments and tendons journal · 2014
    Review

116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johnny PaduloNational Center of Medicine and Science in Sports (CNMSS), Tunis, Tunisia.
Francesco OlivaDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Antonio FrizzieroDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Nicola MaffulliCentre for Sports and Exercise Medicine Queen Mary University of London Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Mile End Hospital London, UK; Head of Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Salerno, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The design, implementation, evaluation, interpretation and report of research is a key important for the science. The research required minimize the uncertainty, therefore we encourage all authors of respect how much can possible the contents in this official editorial also in order to stimulate interest and debate about constructive change in the use of statistics in our disciplines1,2. Authors are required to confirm that these standards and laws have been adhered to by formally citing this editorial within the methods section of their own manuscript.

Indexed as

best practicecase reportdesignethical standardexperimental approachperformance indicatorsreliability of the measuressample sizestatistical analysis

Identifiers

PMID24596686
PMCPMC3940496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.