Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24596670›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance2014

Application of a Poisson distribution quality control measure to the analysis of two human hookworm drug treatment studies in Ghana.

Andrew C Kotze, Robert J Dobson, Debbie Humphries, Michael Wilson, Michael Cappello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew C KotzeCSIRO Animal, Food and Health Sciences, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Robert J DobsonDivision of Health Sciences, School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Debbie HumphriesYale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Michael WilsonDepartment of Parasitology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Michael CappelloYale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA ; Partnerships for Global Health, Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

Epidemiology and molecular mechanisms of anthelminthic treatment failure in KintaR01AI099623 · NIAID · NOGUCHI MEMORIAL INSTITUTE / MEDICAL RES · PI WILSON, MICHAEL D · 2012 to 2016
$605k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI099623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined faecal egg count reduction tests (FECRTs) conducted with hookworm-infected humans in Ghana in 2007 (study 1) and 2010 (study 2) in order to explore aspects of the test analysis. Some subjects showed increased FEC following drug treatment. This occurred mostly in <150 epg pre-treatment FEC subjects. We sought a means to remove 'erroneous' negative drug efficacy cases from the FECRT analysis. Pre- and post-treatment FECs from negative drug efficacy cases were examined to determine whether they represented replicates from a single randomly distributed sample, that is, if they were consistent with a Poisson distribution. Cases where the post-treatment FEC was greater than that expected if it and the pre-treatment sample had been taken from a single random distribution of eggs were excluded from the FECRT. We suggest that these cases most likely represent non-random distribution of eggs in stools, day-to-day variations in egg excretion, or worm patency onset after drug treatment, and hence are not accurate measurements of drug efficacy. This led to exclusion of the most extreme negative drug efficacy cases, with significant increases in overall drug efficacy for study 1 (81.6% vs 89.2%) and study 2 (86.7% vs 89.4%). Excluding FEC <150 individuals from the analysis also increased the study 1 efficacy (81.6% vs 88.9%), however, this resulted in the exclusion of 45% of the study subjects, compared to the exclusion of just 5% using the Poisson distribution method. While low FEC subjects are excluded from livestock FECRTs, the significant prevalence of such subjects in human FECRTs suggests that their exclusion may not be practical. Hence, we suggest that the influence of low FECs can be minimised by excluding 'erroneous' negative efficacy cases using a simple Poisson distribution analysis.

Indexed as

Drug efficacyFECRTHookwormPoisson distribution

Identifiers

PMID24596670
PMCPMC3940077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.