Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24596535›Full record

ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2013

Assessment of general characteristics of patients with primary metastatic breast carcinoma: single center experience.

Ummugul Uyeturk, Burcin Budakoglu, Ibrahim Turker, Kaan Helvaci, Ozlem Uysal Sonmez, Gulali Aktas, Ulku Yalcintas Arslan, Omur Berna Cakmak Oksuzoglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ummugul UyeturkAbant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Bolu, Turkey.
Burcin BudakogluAnkara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, Clinical of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
Ibrahim TurkerAnkara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, Clinical of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
Kaan HelvaciAnkara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, Clinical of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
Ozlem Uysal SonmezAnkara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, Clinical of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
Gulali AktasAbant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Bolu, Turkey.
Ulku Yalcintas ArslanAnkara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, Clinical of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
Omur Berna Cakmak OksuzogluAnkara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, Clinical of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBreast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease. Several subgroups have been identified, according to the clinical presentation and radiographic, pathological, biological, and molecular characteristics of the tumor. Intrinsic genetic heterogeneity may be responsible for these differences. To date, little is known about the clinical features and outcome of patients with primary metastatic BC (PMBC) defined as those presenting with stage IV disease. MATERIAL AND

methodsBetween September 2007 and May 2011, BC patients who were admitted to a clinic were assessed. Patients with PMBC were included in this retrospective analysis. The patients' demographic characteristics, treatment schedules, and survival data were recorded.

resultsOf 2478 BC patients, 102 (4.1%) with PMBC were included in the analysis. The median age of the patients was 50 (26-90) years. Only four patients (3.9%) had previously undergone mammography. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 30 and 66 months, respectively. The PFS and OS were unaffected by age, menopausal status, ECOG, histology, or tumor grade. Both PFS and OS were affected by HR status (log rank p = 0.006, log rank p = 0.04), HER2 status (p = 0.001, p = 0.005), site of metastasis (p = 0.01, p = 0.04), radiotherapy (p = 0.04, OS p = 0.03), and bisphosphonate treatment (p = 0.02, p = 0.006). PFS was greater in the hormone therapy group (43 months, p = 0.03) while OS was greater in the patients that received chemotherapy (76 months, p = 0.01).

conclusionsMammography should be given greater emphasis, considering its importance in the prevention of PMBC. As a treatment option for bone and soft tissue metastatic PMBC patients, hormone therapy should be effective as a first-line treatment.

Indexed as

demographic characteristicsfactors affecting survivalmammographyprimary metastatic breast carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID24596535
PMCPMC3934020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.