Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24596444›Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2014

Role of radiation therapy for renal tumors.

Bhupesh Parashar, Kanhu Charan Patro, Michael Smith, Shruthi Arora, Dattatreyudu Nori, A Gabriella Wernicke

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bhupesh ParasharStich Radiation Center, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
Kanhu Charan PatroMahatma Gandhi Cancer Hospital, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Michael SmithStich Radiation Center, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
Shruthi AroraStich Radiation Center, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
Dattatreyudu NoriStich Radiation Center, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
A Gabriella WernickeStich Radiation Center, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
Cornell University · USCancer Hospital and Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an aggressive malignancy that carries a poor prognosis, especially in patients presenting with advanced stage. Primary treatment for localized RCC is surgical resection however, a significant number of patients still develop locoregional and distant metastasis after curative resection. In metastatic disease, radiation therapy (RT) has been used for palliation routinely for brain and other extracranial lesions with respectable response rates. However, RT for primary RCC has questionable benefit. In this article, the authors discuss the evidence with regards to the role of RT in primary RCC either as a primary treatment, adjuvant treatment, or preoperatively to improve resection outcomes. In addition, novel RT techniques such as stereotactic body radiation therapy and its use in RCC management are also addressed. Finally, the authors discuss the techniques and doses of RT for primary RCC.

Indexed as

intensity-modulated radiation therapyradiationrenalrolestereotactic

Identifiers

PMID24596444
PMCPMC3930657
OpenAlexW2332703963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.