Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24596443›Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2014

Role of combined embolization and ablation in management of renal masses.

Ronald S Winokur, Bradley B Pua, David C Madoff

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ronald S WinokurDivision of Interventional Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Bradley B PuaDivision of Interventional Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
David C MadoffDivision of Interventional Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Cornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combination of minimally invasive treatment modalities is being increasingly utilized to improve local tumor control and overall survival. In the liver, the combination of embolization and ablation results in equivalent overall survival and intrahepatic disease progression as surgical resection for lesions smaller than 7 cm. Ablation alone for small renal masses up to 4 cm results in excellent local tumor control and lack of residual enhancement to suggest viable tumor. A small number of studies have been performed combining embolization and ablation, which result in high rates of local tumor control for tumors smaller than 5 cm. Based on this small cohort, combined embolization and ablation may be most indicated for central or mixed tumors where ablation alone suffers from the greatest degree of "heat sink" effect. This article reviews the theory, methods, and outcomes of combining percutaneous ablative and embolic modalities in the treatment of renal masses.

Indexed as

ablationcombination therapyembolizationinterventional radiologykidney cancerrenal cancer

Identifiers

PMID24596443
PMCPMC3930653
OpenAlexW2328821311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.