Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24595731›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2014

Campylobacter shared between free-ranging cattle and sympatric wild ungulates in a natural environment (NE Spain).

N Navarro-Gonzalez, M Ugarte-Ruiz, M C Porrero, L Zamora, G Mentaberre, E Serrano, A Mateos, S Lavín, L Domínguez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Occurrence ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. PathogenicMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  5. Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Agricultural intensification and the evolution of host specialism in the enteric pathogenProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  8. Genotyping and Antibiotic Resistance Traits inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. First reported case ofJMM case reports · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

N Navarro-GonzalezServei d' Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge (SEFaS), Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animals, UniversitatAutònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
M Ugarte-Ruiz
M C Porrero
L Zamora
G Mentaberre
E Serrano
A Mateos
S Lavín
L Domínguez
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversitat de Lleida · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Campylobacter infections are a public health concern and an increasingly common cause of food-borne zoonoses in the European Union. However, little is known about their spill-over from free-ranging livestock to sympatric wild ungulates, especially in regards to uncommon Campylobacter species. In this study, we aim to determine the prevalence of C. coli, C. jejuni and other C. spp. in game ungulates (wild boar Sus scrofa and Iberian ibex Capra pyrenaica) and free-ranging sympatric cattle in a National Game Reserve in NE Spain. Furthermore, we explore the extent to which Campylobacter species are shared among these co-habiting hosts. Faecal samples from Iberian ibex (n = 181) were negative for C. spp. By direct plating, two wild boars out of 150 were positive for C. coli (1.3%, 95% CI 0.16-4.73), and one was positive for C. jejuni (0.67%, 95% CI 0.02-3.66). The latter was predominant in cattle: 5.45% (n = 55, 95% CI 1.14-5.12), while C. coli was not isolated from this host. C. lanienae was the most frequent species in wild boar at 10% (95% CI 5.7-15.96), and one cow cohabiting with positive wild boars in the same canyon also carried C. lanienae. Four enrichment protocols (using Bolton or Preston broth combined with either mCCDA or CFA) were added for 172 samples (57 from wild boars, 55 cattle and 60 Iberian ibexes) to increase the number of isolates obtained allowing the detection of statistically significant differences. The prevalence of C. lanienae was statistically significantly higher in wild boar than in cattle (P < 0.01), but the prevalence of C. jejuni was higher in the latter (P = 0.045). These results suggest that wild boar and cattle carry their own predominant Campylobacter species, while Iberian ibex do not seem to play an important role in the epidemiology of Campylobacter. However, there is a potential spill-over of C. spp., and thus, further research is needed to elucidate the factors determining inter-species transmission.

Indexed as

Animal DiseasesAnimalsAnimals, WildCampylobacter InfectionsCattleCattle DiseasesDisease ReservoirsFecesGoat DiseasesGoatsLivestockPrevalenceSpainSus scrofaSwineSwine Diseases

Identifiers

PMID24595731
OpenAlexW2025574704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.