Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24595714›Full record

Trial reportCancer2014

Improving colorectal cancer screening in Asian Americans: Results of a randomized intervention study.

Patricia A Carney, Frances Lee-Lin, Solange Mongoue-Tchokote, Motomi Mori, Holden Leung, Christine Lau, T Domi Le, David A Lieberman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Contributing Factors to Colorectal Cancer Screening among Chinese People: A Review of Quantitative Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia A CarneyDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Frances Lee-Lin
Solange Mongoue-Tchokote
Motomi Mori
Holden Leung
Christine Lau
T Domi Le
David A Lieberman
Oregon Health & Science University · USAsian Health Services · US

Funding

Understanding the origins of rapid recurrence of pancreatic cancer after resectionP30CA069533 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Luiz Eduardo Bertassoni · 1997 to 2026
$60.5M
Screening for colortectal cancer in an Asian Community CenterR21CA120974 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI LIEBERMAN, DAVID A · 2007 to 2008
$248k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA069533NCI NIH HHS P30 CA069533CNCI NIH HHS R21 CA120974NCI NIH HHS R21CA120974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to use a randomized controlled trial design to test the impact of an educational intervention delivered by specially trained community health workers among Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese participants ages 50 to 75 years on knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and intentions regarding colorectal cancer screening.

methodsBaseline data were collected on participants' demographic characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, beliefs about cancer, its risk factors, and intention to keep up to date on cancer screening in the future. Fifteen intervention sessions were held between April and June of 2011. Follow-up surveys were administered in the postintervention period to both intervention and control participants. Those randomized to the control group received educational pamphlets in their native language.

resultsThe intervention had the greatest influence on the Chinese subgroup, which had improved scores relative to the control group for perceived behavior control and intentions (preintervention vs postintervention change: control group, -0.16; intervention group, 0.11; P = .004), behavioral beliefs on cancer screening (preintervention vs postintervention change: control group, -0.06; intervention group, 0.24; P = .0001), and attitudes toward behavior (preintervention vs postintervention change: control group, -0.24; intervention group, 0.35; P ≤ .0001). The intervention had no effect on behavioral beliefs about cancer, control beliefs, or perceived behavioral control (reliance on family). Although the intention to stay up to date for cancer screening increased in 2 study groups (Chinese and Vietnamese), these increases were not significant.

conclusionsAn educational program delivered by culturally specific community health educators using culturally appropriate language influences some knowledge, attitude, and behavioral beliefs but not others.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerAgedAged, 80 and overAsianColorectal NeoplasmsCultureFemaleHealth EducationHumansMaleMiddle Agedcancer and culturecancer educationcancer screeningcolorectal cancerhealth disparities

Identifiers

PMID24595714
PMCPMC4041689
OpenAlexW1722361865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.