Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24595418›Full record

ArticleHead and neck pathology2014

Envisioning the next WHO head and neck classification.

Margaret Brandwein-Gensler, Shi Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Head and neck pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Mammary analog secretory carcinoma, low-grade salivary duct carcinoma, and mimickers: a comparative study.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2015
    Article
  15. Salivary Gland Hyalinizing Clear Cell Carcinoma.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Margaret Brandwein-GenslerDepartments of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 3545 North Pavilion, 619 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35249-7331, USA, MGensler@uab.edu.
Shi Wei
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The next WHO classification should abandon "salivary duct carcinoma"; conventional salivary duct carcinoma should be classified as "high-grade salivary duct carcinoma". Low-grade salivary duct carcinoma should replace the current nosology of "low-grade cribriform cystadenocarcinoma". Cystadenocarcinoma should be classified with the descriptor "Not Otherwise Specified" and should be considered an exclusionary diagnostic category. On the other hand, "Not Otherwise Specified" does not fit for hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma (HCCC). The EWSR1-ATF1 fusion is specific for HCCC within the context of salivary neoplasia. We recommend adding "hyalinizing" even though this feature is not present in all cases; the benefit of which is the mental association with a salivary clear cell malignancy. Sinonasal Renal Cell-like Adenocarcinoma (SNRCLA) is a distinct clear cell neoplasm and should be added to the next WHO classification. Future studies will bear out whether SNRCLA is even a low-grade carcinoma, or may be reclassified as "adenoma". Lastly, the next WHO monograph should include the Risk Model in the general introductory statements on oral squamous cell carcinoma, under a subheading of "Histological Prognosticators". The positive predictive value for developing locoregional recurrence in patients with low-stage oral cavity squamous carcinoma (OSCC) and "worst pattern of invasion type-5" (WPOI-5) is 42 %. Low-stage high-risk OSCC with a combination of features other than WPOI-5 is associated with 32 % likelihood for locoregional progression. WPOI-5 also predicts occult metastatic disease (p = 0.0001, Chi squared, 2 DF). Thus the Risk Model can also be used to make decisions regarding staged elective neck dissections.

Indexed as

World Health OrganizationHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID24595418
PMCPMC3950391
OpenAlexW2086384193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.