Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24595244›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Optical metabolic imaging of treatment response in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Amy T Shah, Michelle Demory Beckler, Alex J Walsh, William P Jones, Paula R Pohlmann, Melissa C Skala

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Efficacy Evaluation of "Enhanced" Natural Killers withSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Phasor-FLIM and SHG imaging for quantitative analysis of lung cancer autofluorescence.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Single cell metabolism: current and future trends.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amy T ShahDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Michelle Demory BecklerDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America; Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Alex J WalshDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
William P JonesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Paula R PohlmannDepartment of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Melissa C SkalaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Vanderbilt University · USGeorgetown University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Functional Optical Coherence Tomography for Monitoring Drug Resistance in CancerR00CA142888 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SKALA, MELISSA CAROLINE · 2010 to 2012
$727k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA142888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical metabolic imaging measures fluorescence intensity and lifetimes from metabolic cofactors nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD). These molecular level measurements provide unique biomarkers for early cellular responses to cancer treatments. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is an attractive target for optical imaging because of easy access to the site using fiber optic probes. Two HNSCC cell lines, SCC25 and SCC61, were treated with Cetuximab (anti-EGFR antibody), BGT226 (PI3K/mTOR inhibitor), or cisplatin (chemotherapy) for 24 hours. Results show increased redox ratio, NADH α1 (contribution from free NADH), and FAD α1 (contribution from protein-bound FAD) for malignant cells compared with the nonmalignant cell line OKF6 (p<0.05). In SCC25 and SCC61 cells, the redox ratio is unaffected by cetuximab treatment and decreases with BGT226 and cisplatin treatment (p<0.05), and these results agree with standard measurements of proliferation rates after treatment. For SCC25, NADH α1 is reduced with BGT226 and cisplatin treatment. For SCC61, NADH α1 is reduced with cetuximab, BGT226, and cisplatin treatment. Trends in NADH α1 are statistically similar to changes in standard measurements of glycolytic rates after treatment. FAD α1 is reduced with cisplatin treatment (p<0.05). These shifts in optical endpoints reflect early metabolic changes induced by drug treatment. Overall, these results indicate that optical metabolic imaging has potential to detect early response to cancer treatment in HNSCC, enabling optimal treatment regimens and improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Line, TumorCetuximabCisplatinFlavin-Adenine DinucleotideHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansImidazolesNADOptical ImagingPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinolinesSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck8-(6-methoxypyridin-3-yl)-3-methyl-1-(4-piperazin-1-yl-3-trifluoromethylphenyl)-1,3-dihydroimidazo(4,5-c)quinolin-2-oneAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCetuximabCisplatinFlavin-Adenine DinucleotideImidazolesNADPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID24595244
PMCPMC3942493
OpenAlexW2074141198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.