Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24595214›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2014

Melanosomes or microbes: testing an alternative hypothesis for the origin of microbodies in fossil feathers.

Alison E Moyer, Wenxia Zheng, Elizabeth A Johnson, Matthew C Lamanna, Da-qing Li, Kenneth J Lacovara, Mary H Schweitzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Recent advances in amniote palaeocolour reconstruction and a framework for future research.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular evidence of keratin and melanosomes in feathers of the Early Cretaceous bird Eoconfuciusornis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alison E MoyerDepartment of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Wenxia ZhengDepartment of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Elizabeth A JohnsonPhysical and Life Sciences Department, Colorado Northwestern Community College, Craig, CO, 81625.
Matthew C LamannaSection of Vertebrate Paleontology, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Da-qing LiGansu Geological Museum, Lanzhou, Gansu, China, 730030.
Kenneth J LacovaraDepartment of Biodiversity, Earth and Environmental Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Mary H Schweitzer1] Department of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695 [2] North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC, 27601.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbodies associated with fossil feathers, originally attributed to microbial biofilm, have been reinterpreted as melanosomes: pigment-containing, eukaryotic organelles. This interpretation generated hypotheses regarding coloration in non-avian and avian dinosaurs. Because melanosomes and microbes overlap in size, distribution and morphology, we re-evaluate both hypotheses. We compare melanosomes within feathers of extant chickens with patterns induced by microbial overgrowth on the same feathers, using scanning (SEM), field emission (FESEM) and transmission (TEM) electron microscopy. Melanosomes are always internal, embedded in a morphologically distinct keratinous matrix. Conversely, microbes grow across the surface of feathers in continuous layers, more consistent with published images from fossil feathers. We compare our results to both published literature and new data from a fossil feather ascribed to Gansus yumenensis (ANSP 23403). 'Mouldic impressions' were observed in association with both the feather and sediment grains, supporting a microbial origin. We propose criteria for distinguishing between these two microbodies.

Indexed as

FeathersFossilsMelanosomesAnimalsChickensMicrobodiesMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning

Identifiers

PMID24595214
PMCPMC3942740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.