Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24595158›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Natural enemies delay insect resistance to Bt crops.

Xiaoxia Liu, Mao Chen, Hilda L Collins, David W Onstad, Richard T Roush, Qingwen Zhang, Elizabeth D Earle, Anthony M Shelton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Knockout of theFrontiers in physiology · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The eco-evolutionary impacts of domestication and agricultural practices on wild species.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Xiaoxia LiuDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China; Department of Entomology, Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, New York, United States of America.
Mao ChenDepartment of Entomology, Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, New York, United States of America.
Hilda L CollinsDepartment of Entomology, Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, New York, United States of America.
David W OnstadDepartment of Entomology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.
Richard T RoushMelbourne School of Land and Environment, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Qingwen ZhangDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Elizabeth D EarleDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Anthony M SheltonDepartment of Entomology, Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, New York, United States of America.
Cornell University · USNew York State Department of Agriculture and Markets · USChina Agricultural University · CNUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated whether development of resistance to a Bt crop in the presence of a natural enemy would be slower than without the natural enemy and whether biological control, in conjunction with a Bt crop, could effectively suppress the pest population. Additionally, we investigated whether insecticide-sprayed refuges of non-Bt crops would delay or accelerate resistance to the Bt crop. We used a system of Bt broccoli expressing Cry1Ac, a population of the pest Plutella xylostella with a low frequency of individuals resistant to Cry1Ac and the insecticide spinosad, and a natural enemy, Coleomegilla maculata, to conduct experiments over multiple generations. The results demonstrated that after 6 generations P. xylostella populations were very low in the treatment containing C. maculata and unsprayed non-Bt refuge plants. Furthermore, resistance to Bt plants evolved significantly slower in this treatment. In contrast, Bt plants with no refuge were completely defoliated in treatments without C. maculata after 4-5 generations. In the treatment containing sprayed non-Bt refuge plants and C. maculata, the P. xylostella population was low, although the speed of resistance selection to Cry1Ac was significantly increased. These data demonstrate that natural enemies can delay resistance to Bt plants and have significant implications for integrated pest management (IPM) with Bt crops.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalInsecticide ResistanceAnimalsBacillus thuringiensisInsecta

Identifiers

PMID24595158
PMCPMC3940876
OpenAlexW2044079043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.