Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24594946›Full record

Observational studyThe American journal of gastroenterology2014

A combined paging alert and web-based instrument alters clinician behavior and shortens hospital length of stay in acute pancreatitis.

Matthew J Dimagno, Erik-Jan Wamsteker, Rafat S Rizk, Joshua P Spaete, Suraj Gupta, Tanya Sahay, Jeffrey Costanzo, John M Inadomi, Lena M Napolitano, Robert C Hyzy and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Clinical Decision Support Intervention for Rib Fracture Treatment.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2020
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew J Dimagno1] Departments of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA [2] Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Erik-Jan Wamsteker1] Departments of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA [2] Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Rafat S Rizk1] Departments of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA [2] Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Joshua P SpaeteDepartments of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Suraj GuptaDepartments of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Tanya SahayDepartments of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Jeffrey CostanzoDepartments of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
John M Inadomi1] Departments of Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA [2] Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Lena M NapolitanoDivision of Surgery, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Robert C HyzyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Jeff S DesmondEmergency Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USMichigan Medicine · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Improving Gastrointestinal Disease Outcomes in Vulnerable PopulationsK24DK080941 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI INADOMI, JOHN MATTHEW · 2008 to 2019
$1.8M
Inflammatory response to pancreatitis in CF mice: sodium & impaired apoptosisK08DK073298 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DIMAGNO, MATTHEW J · 2006 to 2010
$716k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK073298NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK080941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere are many published clinical guidelines for acute pancreatitis (AP). Implementation of these recommendations is variable. We hypothesized that a clinical decision support (CDS) tool would change clinician behavior and shorten hospital length of stay (LOS).

methodsDESIGN/

settingObservational study, entitled, The AP Early Response (TAPER) Project. Tertiary center emergency department (ED) and hospital.

participantsTwo consecutive samplings of patients having ICD-9 code (577.0) for AP were generated from the emergency department (ED) or hospital admissions. Diagnosis of AP was based on conventional Atlanta criteria. The Pre-TAPER-CDS-Tool group (5/30/06-6/22/07) had 110 patients presenting to the ED with AP per 976 ICD-9 (577.0) codes and the Post-TAPER-CDS-Tool group (5/30/06-6/22/07) had 113 per 907 ICD-9 codes (7/14/10-5/5/11).

interventionThe TAPER-CDS-Tool, developed 12/2008-7/14/2010, is a combined early, automated paging-alert system, which text pages ED clinicians about a patient with AP and an intuitive web-based point-of-care instrument, consisting of seven early management recommendations.

resultsThe pre- vs. post-TAPER-CDS-Tool groups had similar baseline characteristics. The post-TAPER-CDS-Tool group met two management goals more frequently than the pre-TAPER-CDS-Tool group: risk stratification (P<0.0001) and intravenous fluids >6L/1st 0-24 h (P=0.0003). Mean (s.d.) hospital LOS was significantly shorter in the post-TAPER-CDS-Tool group (4.6 (3.1) vs. 6.7 (7.0) days, P=0.0126). Multivariate analysis identified four independent variables for hospital LOS: the TAPER-CDS-Tool associated with shorter LOS (P=0.0049) and three variables associated with longer LOS: Japanese severity score (P=0.0361), persistent organ failure (P=0.0088), and local pancreatic complications (<0.0001).

conclusionsThe TAPER-CDS-Tool is associated with changed clinician behavior and shortened hospital LOS, which has significant financial implications.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesInternetMedical Order Entry SystemsAcute DiseaseAdultEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospital Communication SystemsHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPancreatitisPhysiciansPractice Patterns, Physicians'

Identifiers

PMID24594946
PMCPMC5565843
OpenAlexW2049713601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.