Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24594786›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Isolation and identification of quercetin degrading bacteria from human fecal microbes.

Zhichao Zhang, Xichun Peng, Shaoting Li, Ning Zhang, Yong Wang, Hua Wei

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Plant quercetin degradation by gut bacteriumFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Zebrafish and Flavonoids: Adjuvants against Obesity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhichao ZhangDepartment of Food Science and Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Xichun PengDepartment of Food Science and Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Shaoting LiDepartment of Food Science and Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Ning ZhangDepartment of Food Science and Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Yong WangDepartment of Food Science and Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Hua WeiState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quercetin has a wide range of biological properties. The gut microflora can often modulate its biological activity and their potential health effects. There still is a lack of information about gut bacteria involving in this process. The strains of gut microbes from human feces that can transform quercetin were isolated and identified by in vitro fermentation. The results showed that Escherichia coli, Stretococcus lutetiensis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Weissella confusa, Enterococcus gilvus, Clostridium perfringens and Bacteroides fragilis have the various ability of degrading quercetin. Among them, C. perfringens and B. fragilis were discovered to have the strongest ability of degrading quercetin. Additionally, quercetin can't inhibit the growth of C. perfringens. In conclusion, many species of gut microbiota can degrade quercetin, but their ability are different.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsBacteriaBacteroides fragilisClostridium perfringensFecesFermentationHumansQuercetinAntioxidantsQuercetin

Identifiers

PMID24594786
PMCPMC3942438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.