ArticlePloS one2014
A comparison of screening methods to identify waterlogging tolerance in the field in Brassica napus L. during plant ontogeny.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distinct physiological and transcriptomic responses between tolerant and susceptible rapeseed (Brassica napus) germplasm to flooding stress.BMC genomic data · 2026Article
- Response of wheat crop to water-logged conditions under different land configurations and nutrient management.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A review of soil waterlogging impacts, mechanisms, and adaptive strategies.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- The roles of cell wall polysaccharides in response to waterlogging stress in Brassica napus L. root.BMC biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Morpho-physiological and transcriptomic responses of field pennycress to waterlogging.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Tissue-Specific Transcriptome and Metabolome Analysis Reveals the Response Mechanism ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Phenotyping for waterlogging tolerance in crops: current trends and future prospects.Journal of experimental botany · 2022Review
- Physiological and comparative transcriptome analyses reveal the mechanisms underlying waterlogging tolerance in a rapeseed anthocyanin-more mutant.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2022Article
- Calcium peroxide alleviates the waterlogging stress of rapeseed by improving root growth status in a rice-rape rotation field.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Transcriptional Response of TwoFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Ultrastructure, adaptability, and alleviation mechanisms of photosynthetic apparatus in plants under waterlogging: A review.Photosynthetica · 2022Article
- Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Genes of Flooding-Tolerant and Flooding-Sensitive Rapeseeds Differentially Respond to Flooding at the Germination Stage.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Effects of supplemental nitrogen application on physiological characteristics, dry matter and nitrogen accumulation of winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under waterlogging stress.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Soil Enzyme Activity in Soils Subjected to Flooding and the Effect on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Uptake by Oilseed Rape.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Article
- Proteomic Analysis of Rapeseed Root Response to Waterlogging Stress.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Waterlogging tolerance is typically evaluated at a specific development stage, with an implicit assumption that differences in waterlogging tolerance expressed in these systems will result in improved yield performance in fields. It is necessary to examine these criteria in fields. In the present study, three experiments were conducted to screen waterlogging tolerance in 25 rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) varieties at different developmental stages, such as seedling establishment stage and seedling stage at controlled environment, and maturity stage in the fields. The assessments for physiological parameters at three growth stages suggest that there were difference of waterlogging tolerance at all the development stages, providing an important basis for further development of breeding more tolerant materials. The results indicated that flash waterlogging restricts plant growth and growth is still restored after removal of the stress. Correlation analysis between waterlogging tolerance coefficient (WTC) of yield and other traits revealed that there was consistency in waterlogging tolerance of the genotypes until maturity, and good tolerance at seedling establishment stage and seedling stage can guarantee tolerance in later stages. The waterlogging-tolerant plants could be selected using some specific traits at any stage, and selections would be more effective at the seedling establishment stage. Thus, our study provides a method for screening waterlogging tolerance, which would enable the suitable basis for initial selection of a large number of germplasm or breeding populations for waterlogging tolerance and help for verifying their potential utility in crop-improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.