Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24594670›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Dietary exposure to aluminium and health risk assessment in the residents of Shenzhen, China.

Mei Yang, Lixin Jiang, Huiping Huang, Shengbo Zeng, Fen Qiu, Miao Yu, Xiaorong Li, Sheng Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Jellyfish as Food: A Narrative Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Probabilistic Risk Analysis to Assess Dietary Exposure to Aluminum in the Taiwanese Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Potential Role of Fluoride in the Etiopathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mei YangDepartment of Health Surveillance and Management, Futian District Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China; Department of Laboratory, Futian District Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Lixin JiangDepartment of Health Surveillance and Management, Futian District Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Huiping HuangDepartment of Health Surveillance and Management, Futian District Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Shengbo ZengDepartment of Laboratory, Futian District Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Fen QiuDepartment of Laboratory, Futian District Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Miao YuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiaorong LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Sheng WeiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although there are great changes of dietary in the past few decades in China, few are known about the aluminium exposure in Chinese diet. The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate the dietary aluminium intake level in residents of Shenzhen, China. A total of 853 persons from 244 household were investigated their diet by three days food records. Finally, 149 kinds of foods in 17 food groups were selected to be the most consumed foods. From them, 1399 food samples were collected from market to test aluminium concentration. High aluminium levels were found in jellyfish (median, 527.5 mg/kg), fried twisted cruller (median, 466.0 mg/kg), shell (median, 107.1 mg/kg). The Shenzhen residents' average dietary aluminium exposure was estimated at 1.263 mg/kg bw/week which is lower than the PTWI (provisional tolerable weekly intake). But 0-2 and 3-13 age groups have the highest aluminium intake exceeding the PTWI (3.356 mg/kg bw/week and 3.248 mg/kg bw/week) than other age groups. And the main dietary aluminium exposure sources are fried twisted cruller, leaf vegetables and bean products. Our study suggested that even three decades rapid economy development, children in Shenzhen still have high dietary aluminium exposure risk. How to control high dietary aluminium exposure still is a great public health challenge in Shenzhen, China.

Indexed as

DietEnvironmental ExposureAluminumChinaFood ContaminationHumansRisk AssessmentAluminum

Identifiers

PMID24594670
PMCPMC3940618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.