Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24594094›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2014

Maternal bias and escape from X chromosome imprinting in the midgestation mouse placenta.

Elizabeth H Finn, Cheryl L Smith, Jesse Rodriguez, Arend Sidow, Julie C Baker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. X-Chromosome Inactivation and Escape from X Inactivation in Mouse.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genomic imprinting, disrupted placental expression, and speciation.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth H FinnDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
Cheryl L SmithDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, United States; Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
Jesse RodriguezDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, United States; Biomedical Informatics Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
Arend SidowDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, United States; Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
Julie C BakerDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, United States. Electronic address: jbaker@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING GRANT IN GENOME SCIENCET32HG000044 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL P. SNYDER · 1995 to 2026
$32.2M
POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN MEDICAL INFORMATION SCIENCEST15LM007033 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SYLVIA KATINA PLEVRITIS · 1985 to 2026
$25.5M
Using Embryos to Understand the Chromatin State of Mesoderm InductionR01GM103787 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BAKER, JULIE C · 2012 to 2015
$1.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000044NIGMS NIH HHS GM103787-02NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103787NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the epigenetic landscape at the interface between mother and fetus, we provide a comprehensive analysis of parent-of-origin bias in the mouse placenta. Using F1 interspecies hybrids between mus musculus (C57BL/6J) and mus musculus castaneus, we sequenced RNA from 23 individual midgestation placentas, five late stage placentas, and two yolk sac samples and then used SNPs to determine whether transcripts were preferentially generated from the maternal or paternal allele. In the placenta, we find 103 genes that show significant and reproducible parent-of-origin bias, of which 78 are novel candidates. Most (96%) show a strong maternal bias which we demonstrate, via multiple mathematical models, pyrosequencing, and FISH, is not due to maternal decidual contamination. Analysis of the X chromosome also reveals paternal expression of Xist and several genes that escape inactivation, most significantly Alas2, Fhl1, and Slc38a5. Finally, sequencing individual placentas allowed us to reveal notable expression similarity between littermates. In all, we observe a striking preference for maternal transcription in the midgestation mouse placenta and a dynamic imprinting landscape in extraembryonic tissues, reflecting the complex nature of epigenetic pathways in the placenta.

Indexed as

Genomic Imprinting5-Aminolevulinate SynthetaseAmino Acid Transport Systems, NeutralAnimalsChromosomes, MammalianCluster AnalysisFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGestational AgeHybridization, GeneticInheritance PatternsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLIM Domain ProteinsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BL5-Aminolevulinate SynthetaseALAS2 protein, mouseAmino Acid Transport Systems, NeutralFhl1 protein, mouseIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLIM Domain ProteinsMuscle ProteinsRNA, Long NoncodingSNAT5 protein, mouseXIST non-coding RNAImprintingParent-of-origin biasPlacentaRNA sequencingX-inactivation

Identifiers

PMID24594094
PMCPMC4045483
OpenAlexW2085508232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.