Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24594074›Full record

Trial reportGynecologic oncology2014

A phase II evaluation of pazopanib in the treatment of recurrent or persistent carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Susana M Campos, William E Brady, Katherine M Moxley, Roisin E O'Cearbhaill, Paula S Lee, Paul A DiSilvestro, Jacob Rotmensch, Peter G Rose, Premal H Thaker, David M O'Malley and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gynecologic oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Should MMMT still be treated with adjuvant taxane-based combination chemotherapy?Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review of Recommended Treatment of Uterine Carcinosarcoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Susana M CamposDana-Farber Partners Cancer Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: Susana_Campos@dfci.harvard.edu.
William E BradyGynecologic Oncology Group Statistical & Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.
Katherine M MoxleyUniversity of Oklahoma Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Roisin E O'CearbhaillMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Paula S LeeDuke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Paul A DiSilvestroWomen & Infants Hospital, Providence, RI 02905, USA.
Jacob RotmenschRush-Presbyterian St. Lukes Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Peter G RoseCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Premal H ThakerWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
David M O'MalleyOhio State University, Columbus Cancer Council, Hilliard, OH 43026, USA.
Parviz HanjaniAbington Memorial Hospital, Abington, PA 19001, USA.
Rosemary E ZunaUniversity of Oklahoma Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Martee L HensleyMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USOklahoma City University · USAbington Memorial Hospital · USCleveland Clinic · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USDuke University · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USRush University Medical Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · USWomen & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP HEADQUARTERSU10CA027469 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 1985 to 2013
$132.6M
Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MARK G FRATTINI · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP STATISTICAL OFFICEU10CA037517 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI BLESSING, JOHN A · 1985 to 2013
$67.4M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareUG1CA233180 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Harold John Burstein · 2019 to 2026
$8.6M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareU10CA180867 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI BURSTEIN, HAROLD JOHN, KIBEL, ADAM S · 2014 to 2018
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS U10 CA027469NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037517NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180867NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCarcinosarcomas of the female genital tract, also called malignant mixed müllerian tumors, are aggressive biphasic tumors. Second-line treatment options in the recurrent/persistent setting have yielded marginal responses. Given the potential role of angiogenesis in the gynecological carcinomas, pazopanib, a VEGFR inhibitor, was investigated in the management of patients with recurrent carcinosarcoma of the uterus.

methodsEligible patients had histologically confirmed carcinosarcoma of the uterus, a maximum of two prior lines of therapy, adequate renal, hepatic and hematologic function and a performance status of 0-2. Pazopanib was administered orally at 800mg. Two dose reductions were allowed. The primary objective was to ascertain the activity of pazopanib as measured by the proportion of patients who survive progression-free for at least six months and the proportion of patients that have objective tumor responses. Secondary objectives included the frequency and severity of adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0.

resultsOf the 22 enrolled patients, 19 were eligible and evaluable for toxicity and survival. No patients had a partial or complete response (90% confidence interval [CI]: 0%, 14.6%). Three patients (15.8%) had PFS ≥6months (90% CI: 4.4%, 35.9%). The median PFS was 2.0months (first and third quartiles were 1.6 and 4.0months, respectively). The median overall survival was 8.7months (first and third quartiles were 2.6 and 14.0months, respectively).

conclusionPazopanib demonstrated minimal activity as a second or third line treatment for advanced uterine carcinosarcoma. Potential clinical trial participation should be discussed with the patients.

Indexed as

AgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsCarcinosarcomaDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansIndazolesMiddle AgedMixed Tumor, MullerianNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPyrimidinesReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorSulfonamidesTreatment OutcomeUterine NeoplasmsAngiogenesis InhibitorsIndazolespazopanibPyrimidinesReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorSulfonamidesAngiogenesisCarcinosarcomaUterusVEGFR inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID24594074
PMCPMC4360988
OpenAlexW2065127630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.