Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24593999›Full record

ArticleVaccine2014

Adjuvant-carrying synthetic vaccine particles augment the immune response to encapsulated antigen and exhibit strong local immune activation without inducing systemic cytokine release.

Petr O Ilyinskii, Christopher J Roy, Conlin P O'Neil, Erica A Browning, Lynnelle A Pittet, David H Altreuter, Frank Alexis, Elena Tonti, Jinjun Shi, Pamela A Basto and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Investigating silver nanoparticles and resiquimod as a local melanoma treatment.European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V · 2023
    Article
  11. Nanomaterials and Their Impact on the Immune System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Petr O IlyinskiiSelecta Biosciences, Watertown, MA 02472, USA. Electronic address: PIlyinskii@selectabio.com.
Christopher J RoySelecta Biosciences, Watertown, MA 02472, USA.
Conlin P O'NeilSelecta Biosciences, Watertown, MA 02472, USA.
Erica A BrowningSelecta Biosciences, Watertown, MA 02472, USA.
Lynnelle A PittetSelecta Biosciences, Watertown, MA 02472, USA.
David H AltreuterSelecta Biosciences, Watertown, MA 02472, USA.
Frank AlexisLaboratory of Nanomedicine and Biomaterials, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Elena TontiDepartment of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Jinjun ShiLaboratory of Nanomedicine and Biomaterials, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Pamela A BastoDavid H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Matteo IannaconeDepartment of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Aleksandar F Radovic-MorenoDavid H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Robert S LangerDavid H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Omid C FarokhzadLaboratory of Nanomedicine and Biomaterials, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Ulrich H von AndrianDepartment of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Lloyd P M JohnstonSelecta Biosciences, Watertown, MA 02472, USA.
Takashi Kei KishimotoSelecta Biosciences, Watertown, MA 02472, USA.
Selecta Biosciences (United States) · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USHarvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology · USKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research At MIT

Funding

VIRUS PRODUCTION COREP30CA014051 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Paula T Hammond · 1985 to 2026
$93.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Augmentation of immunogenicity can be achieved by particulate delivery of an antigen and by its co-administration with an adjuvant. However, many adjuvants initiate strong systemic inflammatory reactions in vivo, leading to potential adverse events and safety concerns. We have developed a synthetic vaccine particle (SVP) technology that enables co-encapsulation of antigen with potent adjuvants. We demonstrate that co-delivery of an antigen with a TLR7/8 or TLR9 agonist in synthetic polymer nanoparticles results in a strong augmentation of humoral and cellular immune responses with minimal systemic production of inflammatory cytokines. In contrast, antigen encapsulated into nanoparticles and admixed with free TLR7/8 agonist leads to lower immunogenicity and rapid induction of high levels of inflammatory cytokines in the serum (e.g., TNF-a and IL-6 levels are 50- to 200-fold higher upon injection of free resiquimod (R848) than of nanoparticle-encapsulated R848). Conversely, local immune stimulation as evidenced by cellular infiltration of draining lymph nodes and by intranodal cytokine production was more pronounced and persisted longer when SVP-encapsulated TLR agonists were used. The strong local immune activation achieved using a modular self-assembling nanoparticle platform markedly enhanced immunogenicity and was equally effective whether antigen and adjuvant were co-encapsulated in a single nanoparticle formulation or co-delivered in two separate nanoparticles. Moreover, particle encapsulation enabled the utilization of CpG oligonucleotides with the natural phosphodiester backbone, which are otherwise rapidly hydrolyzed by nucleases in vivo. The use of SVP may enable clinical use of potent TLR agonists as vaccine adjuvants for indications where cellular immunity or robust humoral responses are required.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsAntibody FormationAntigensCells, CulturedCytokinesFemaleImidazolesImmunity, CellularMice, Inbred C57BLOligodeoxyribonucleotidesSpleenToll-Like Receptor 7Toll-Like Receptor 8Toll-Like Receptor 9Adjuvants, ImmunologicAntigensCpG ODN 1826CytokinesImidazolesOligodeoxyribonucleotidesresiquimodToll-Like Receptor 7Toll-Like Receptor 8Toll-Like Receptor 9Vaccines, SyntheticAdjuvantCpGR848ResiquimodSynthetic nanoparticle vaccineTLR agonist

Identifiers

PMID24593999
PMCPMC4059049
OpenAlexW2073423503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.