ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2014
Magnesium-containing nanostructured hybrid scaffolds for enhanced dentin regeneration.
Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancements and applications of gelatin-based scaffolds in dental engineering: a narrative review.Odontology · 2026Review
- Engineering of Bioresorbable Polymers for Tissue Engineering and Drug Delivery Applications.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Review
- Tissue engineering approaches for dental pulp regeneration: The development of novel bioactive materials using pharmacological epigenetic inhibitors.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Effect of magnesium oxide nanoparticles and LED irradiation on the viability and differentiation of human stem cells of the apical papilla.Biotechnology letters · 2024Article
- Epigenetic therapeutics in dental pulp treatment: Hopes, challenges and concerns for the development of next-generation biomaterials.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- Evaluation of dental pulp stem cells behavior after odontogenic differentiation induction by three different bioactive materials on two different scaffolds.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Effects of CEM cement and emdogain on proliferation and differentiation of human stem cells from the apical papilla: a comparative in vitro study.Biotechnology letters · 2023Article
- The current regenerative medicine approaches of craniofacial diseases: A narrative review.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- Review
- Bioinductive and anti-inflammatory properties of Propolis and Biodentine on SHED.The Saudi dental journal · 2022Article
- Review
- Synthetic materials in craniofacial regenerative medicine: A comprehensive overview.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Nanofibrous scaffolds for regenerative endodontics treatment.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Application of dental stem cells in three-dimensional tissue regeneration.World journal of stem cells · 2021Review
- Research status of biodegradable metals designed for oral and maxillofacial applications: A review.Bioactive materials · 2021Review
- In Vivo Evaluation of Decellularized Human Tooth Scaffold for Dental Tissue Regeneration.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Dental Pulp Stem Cell Polarization: Effects of Biophysical Factors.Journal of dental research · 2021Article
- Platform technologies for regenerative endodontics from multifunctional biomaterials to tooth-on-a-chip strategies.Clinical oral investigations · 2021Review
- Multifunctional peptide-conjugated nanocarriers for pulp regeneration in a full-length human tooth root.Acta biomaterialia · 2021Article
- Which experimental models and explorations to use in regenerative endodontics? A comprehensive review on standard practices.Molecular biology reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Dental caries is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases in the United States, affecting 92% of adults aged 20-64 years. Scaffold-based tissue engineering represents a promising strategy to replace damaged dental structures and restore their biological functions. Current single-component scaffolding materials used for dental tissue regeneration, however, cannot provide the proper microenvironment for dental stem/progenitor cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation; new biomimetic hybrid scaffolds are needed to promote better dental tissue formation. In this work, we developed a biomimetic approach to prepare three-dimensional (3D) nanofibrous gelatin/magnesium phosphate (NF-gelatin/MgP) hybrid scaffolds. These scaffolds not only mimic the nanostructured architecture and the chemical composition of natural dentin matrices but also constantly present favorable chemical signals (Mg ions) to dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), thus providing a desirable microenvironment to facilitate DPSC proliferation, differentiation, and biomineralization. Synthesized hybrid NF-gelatin/MgP possesses natural extracellular matrix (ECM)-like architecture, high porosity, high pore interconnectivity, well-defined pore size, and controlled Mg ion release from the scaffold. Adding MgP into NF-gelatin also increased the mechanical strength of the hybrid scaffold. The sustained release of Mg ions from the NF-gelatin/MgP (MgP=10% wt/wt) scaffold significantly enhanced the proliferation, differentiation, and biomineralization of human DPSCs in vitro. The alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and the gene expressions for odontogenic differentiation (collagen I [Col I], ALP, osteocalcin [OCN], dentin sialophosphoprotein [DSPP], and dentin matrix protein 1 [DMP1]) were all significantly higher (p<0.05) in the NF-gelatin/MgP group than in the NF-gelatin group. Those results were further confirmed by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and von Kossa staining, as shown by greater ECM secretion and mineral deposition in the hybrid scaffold. Consistent with the in vitro study, the DPSCs/NF-gelatin/MgP constructs produced greater ECM deposition, hard tissue formation, and expression of marker proteins (DSPP, DMP1, Col I) for odontogenic differentiation than did the DPSCs/NF-gelatin after 5 weeks of ectopic implantation in rude mice. The controlled release of metallic ions from biomimetic nanostructured hybrid scaffolds, therefore, is a promising approach to enhancing the biological capability of the scaffolds for dental tissue regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.