ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015
Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Feasibility and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Shared Decision-making Process in a Tertiary University Hospital: Protocol of a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial
Decisional Conflict in Patients With Advanced Cancer in a Shared Decision-Making Model: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The quality of instruments to assess the process of shared decision making: A systematic review.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Use of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc) in intervention studies-A systematic review.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Evaluating the quality of shared decision making during the patient-carer encounter: a systematic review of tools.BMC research notes · 2016Pooled it
- Effect of receiving a customizable brochure on breast cancer patients' knowledge about their diagnosis and treatment: A randomized clinical trial.Cancer medicine · 2023Trial
- Scoping review of instruments measuring organizational context in implementation studies within healthcare.Health research policy and systems · 2026Review
- Psychometric Validation and Reliability of the 9-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire: A Systematic Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2025Review
- Psychometric properties of the Danish SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in patients with pelvic floor disorders and low back pain: item response theory modelling.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Correlates of Control Preferences, Participation in Decision-making and Activation in Patients with Substance Use Disorder.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Impact of a Training Program in Shared Decision-Making for Neurologists Treating People with Migraine.Neurology and therapy · 2023Article
- Confucian Familism and Shared Decision Making in End-of-Life Care for Patients with Advanced Cancers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Psychometric Properties of the 9-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9): Validation of the Italian Version in a Large Psychiatric Clinical Sample.Clinical neuropsychiatry · 2022Article
- Patient experience, satisfaction and shared decision-making in colorectal cancer screening: protocol of the mixed-methods study CyDESA.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Article
- Independence of Coping Styles With the Patient-Doctor Relationship and Shared Decision-Making in People With Parkinson's Disease.Journal of patient experience · 2020Article
- Testing the hypothesis of subtypes of nonadherence in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: A prospective study.World journal of psychiatry · 2020Article
- Compulsory admissions and preferences in decision-making in patients with psychotic and bipolar disorders.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2020Article
- Biopsychosocial and clinical characteristics in patients with resected breast and colon cancer at the beginning and end of adjuvant treatment.BMC cancer · 2019Article
- [Physicians' awareness and assessment of shared decision making in oncology practice.]Revista espanola de salud publica · 2019Article
- Patients' perceptions of a culturally targeted Hispanic Kidney Transplant Program: A mixed methods study.Clinical transplantation · 2019Article
- Validity and reliability of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in a national survey in Hungary.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo translate and assess the psychometric properties of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) for measuring patients' perceptions of how clinicians' performance fits the SDM process.
designCross-sectional study. SETTING AND
participantsData were collected in primary care health centres. Patients suffering from chronic diseases and facing a medical decision were included in the study. MEASUREMENTS: The original German SDM-Q-9 was translated to Spanish using the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-reported measures as the methodological model for Spanish translation. Reliability (internal consistency) and construct validity [exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)] were assessed.
resultsThe final Spanish version of the SDM-Q-9 was tested in a primary care sample of 540 patients. The SDM-Q-9 presented adequate reliability and acceptable validity. Internal consistency yielded a Cronbach's alpha of 0.885 for the whole scale. EFA showed a two-factorial solution, and for the CFA, the best solution was obtained with a one-dimensional factor with the item 1 excluded, which produced the best indexes of fit. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsThe Spanish version of the SDM-Q-9 showed adequate reliability and acceptable validity parameters among primary care patients. The SDM-Q-9 is suitable for use in Spain and other Spanish-speaking countries with similarly organized health-care systems. The use of the SDM-Q-9 may contribute to the evaluation of SDM process from the patient's perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.