Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24592313›Full record

ReviewF1000prime reports2014

Epithelial adhesive junctions.

Christopher T Capaldo, Attila E Farkas, Asma Nusrat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000prime reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Biomolecules · 2024
    Article
  3. Squishy matters - Corneal mechanobiology in health and disease.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2024
    Review
  4. Stabilization ofAmerican journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Proteomics and its applications in breast cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Progress in Mycotoxins Affecting Intestinal Mucosal Barrier Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mycotoxin: Its Impact on Gut Health and Microbiota.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher T CapaldoEpithelial Pathobiology Research Unit, Department of Pathology, Emory University 615 Michael Street, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA.
Attila E FarkasEpithelial Pathobiology Research Unit, Department of Pathology, Emory University 615 Michael Street, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA.
Asma NusratEpithelial Pathobiology Research Unit, Department of Pathology, Emory University 615 Michael Street, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial adhesive cell-to-cell contacts contain large, plasma membrane-spanning multiprotein aggregates that perform vital structural and signaling functions. Three prominent adhesive contacts are the tight junction, adherens junction, and the desmosome. Each junction type has unique cellular functions and a complex molecular composition. In this review, we comment on recent and exciting advances in our understanding of junction composition and function.

Identifiers

PMID24592313
PMCPMC3883420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.