Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24592084›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2013

Pregnancy of unknown location.

Gökhan Boyraz, Gürkan Bozdağ

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Reproducible Bioconductor workflows using browser-based interactive notebooks and containers.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gökhan BoyrazDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Gürkan BozdağDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Hacettepe University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) is defined as the situation when the pregnancy test is positive but there are no signs of intrauterine pregnancy or an extrauterine pregnancy via transvaginal ultra-sonography. It is not always possible to determine the location of the pregnancy in cases of PUL. The reported rate of PUL among women attending early pregnancy units varies between 5 and 42% in the literature and the frequency of PUL incidents has increased with the increase in the number of early pregnancy units. The management of PUL seems to be highly crucial in obstetrics clinics. Therefore, in the current review, issues identified from the literature related to pregnancy of unknown location, potential tools for prediction and algorithms will be discussed.

Indexed as

ectopic pregnancyPregnancy of unknown locationspontaneous abortion

Identifiers

PMID24592084
PMCPMC3881745
OpenAlexW2107301169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.