Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24591826›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2014

Subtype classification for prediction of prognosis of breast cancer from a biomarker panel: correlations and indications.

Chuang Chen, Jing-Ping Yuan, Wen Wei, Yi Tu, Feng Yao, Xue-Qin Yang, Jin-Zhong Sun, Sheng-Rong Sun, Yan Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intraductal Therapy in Breast Cancer: Current Status and Future Prospective.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2020
    Review
  2. Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Review of Conventional and Advanced Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chuang ChenDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Wuhan University, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Jing-Ping YuanDepartment of Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University and Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors and Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Wuhan, People's Republic of China ; Department of Pathology, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Wen WeiDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Wuhan University, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Yi TuDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Wuhan University, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Feng YaoDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Wuhan University, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Xue-Qin YangMedical School of Jingchu University of Technology, Jingmen, People's Republic of China.
Jin-Zhong SunDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Wuhan University, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Sheng-Rong SunDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Wuhan University, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Yan LiDepartment of Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University and Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors and Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Wuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHormone receptors, including the estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and other biomarkers like Ki67, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR, also known as HER1), the androgen receptor, and p53, are key molecules in breast cancer. This study evaluated the relationship between HER2 and hormone receptors and explored the additional prognostic value of Ki67, EGFR, the androgen receptor, and p53.

methodsQuantitative determination of HER2 and EGFR was performed in 240 invasive breast cancer tissue microarray specimens using quantum dot (QD)-based nanotechnology. We identified two subtypes of HER2, ie, high total HER2 load (HTH2) and low total HER2 load (LTH2), and three subtypes of hormone receptor, ie, high hormone receptor (HHR), low hormone receptor (LHR), and no hormone receptor (NHR). Therefore, breast cancer patients could be divided into five subtypes according to HER2 and hormone receptor status. Ki67, p53, and the androgen receptor were determined by traditional immunohistochemistry techniques. The relationship between hormone receptors and HER2 was investigated and the additional value of Ki67, EGFR, the androgen receptor, and p53 for prediction of 5-year disease-free survival was assessed.

resultsIn all patients, quantitative determination showed a statistically significant (P<0.001) negative correlation between HER2 and the hormone receptors and a significant positive correlation (P<0.001) between the estrogen receptor and the progesterone receptor (r=0.588), but a significant negative correlation (P<0.001, r=-0.618) with the HHR subtype. There were significant differences between the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 subtypes with regard to total HER2 load and hormone receptor subtypes. The rates of androgen receptor and p53 positivity were 46.3% and 57.0%, respectively. Other than the androgen receptor, differences in expression of Ki67, EGFR, and p53 did not achieve statistical significance (P>0.05) between the five subtypes. EGFR and Ki67 had prognostic significance for 5-year disease-free survival in univariate analysis, but the androgen receptor and p53 did not. Multivariate analysis identified that EGFR expression had predictive significance for 5-year disease-free survival in hormone-receptor positive patients and in those with the lymph node-positive breast cancer subtype.

conclusionHormone receptor expression was indeed one of the molecular profiles in the subtypes identified by quantitative HER2 and vice versa. EGFR status may provide discriminative prognostic information in addition to HER2 and hormone receptor status, and should be integrated into routine practice to help formulate more specific prediction of the prognosis and appropriate individualized treatment.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenNanomedicineNanotechnologyPrognosisQuantum DotsReceptors, AndrogenReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTumor Suppressor Protein p53AR protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorEGFR protein, humanERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsKi-67 AntigenReceptors, AndrogenReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53breast cancermolecular classificationpredictionprognosisquantum dots

Identifiers

PMID24591826
PMCPMC3937188
OpenAlexW2084791564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.