Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24591823›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2014

A review of halotherapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Rachael Rashleigh, Sheree M S Smith, Nicola J Roberts

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07737587 (Yoga-Based Breathing Exercises Performed in a Salt-Cave Environment Versus a Standard Clinical Setting in Smokers), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07737587 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Yoga-Based Breathing Exercises Performed in a Salt-Cave Environment Versus a Standard Clinical Setting in Smokers: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSinop UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsTobacco Smoking, Respiratory FunctionArmsYoga-Based Breathing Exercise Program in a Salt-Cave Environment, Yoga-Based Breathing Exercise Program in a Standard Clinical Setting
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Halophilic ArchaeaFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Content analysis of promotional material for asthma-related products and therapies on Instagram.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachael RashleighFamily and Community Health University Research Group, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Campbelltown Campus, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sheree M S SmithFamily and Community Health University Research Group, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Campbelltown Campus, Sydney, NSW, Australia ; Centre for Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Division of Experimental Medicine, Imperial College, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom.
Nicola J RobertsInstitute of Applied Health Research, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland.
Glasgow Caledonian University · GBImperial College London · GBWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic, progressive disease and is treated with inhaled medication to optimize the patient's lung health through decreasing their symptoms, especially breathlessness. Halotherapy is the inhalation of micronized dry salt within a chamber that mimics a salt cave environment. Recent media reports suggest that this therapy may help with the symptoms of COPD.

objectiveTo critically evaluate and summarize the evidence for the use of halotherapy as a treatment for COPD.

designA review using systematic approach and narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were searched. Two reviewers independently reviewed abstracts and selected eligible studies based on predetermined selection criteria.

resultsOf the 151 articles retrieved from databases and relevant reference lists, only one randomized controlled trial met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was unable to be conducted due to the limited number of published studies. Inclusion criteria were subsequently expanded to allow three case-control studies to be included, ensuring that a narrative synthesis could be completed. From the pooled data of the four studies, there were 1,041 participants (661 in the intervention group and 380 in the control group). The assessment of methodological quality raised issues associated with randomization and patient selection. Three themes were identified from the narrative synthesis: respiratory function, quality of life, and medication use.

conclusionThemes generated from the narrative synthesis data reflect outcome measures regularly used for interventional research associated with COPD. From this review, recommendations for inclusion of halotherapy as a therapy for COPD cannot be made at this point and there is a need for high quality studies to determine the effectiveness of this therapy.

Indexed as

SpeleotherapyAdministration, InhalationAerosolsHumansLungPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionRespiratory TherapySodium ChlorideTreatment OutcomeAerosolsSodium Chlorideaerosolchronic diseaselung diseasesalt cavesalt therapyspeleotherapy

Identifiers

PMID24591823
PMCPMC3937102
OpenAlexW1979811097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.