Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24591702›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2014

MS-viewer: a web-based spectral viewer for proteomics results.

Peter R Baker, Robert J Chalkley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Glycopeptide Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis Using Protein Prospector.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. O-GlcNAc informatics: advances and trends.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter R BakerMass Spectrometry Facility, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158.
Robert J Chalkley

Funding

Bio-Organic Biomedical Mass Spectromy ResourceP41GM103481 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BURLINGAME, ALMA L · 2012 to 2015
$6.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS 8P41GM103481NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sharing and viewing of peptide identification results from search engines analyzing mass-spectrometry-based proteomic data is made difficult by the range of analysis tools employed, in that each produces a different output format. Annotated results associated with a journal article often have to be made available, but providing these in a format that can be queried by other researchers is often difficult. This is because although standard formats for results have been developed, these are not necessarily easy to produce. In this manuscript we describe the MS-Viewer program, part of the Protein Prospector Web package, which uses easy-to-create tabular files as input for providing highly interactive viewing of search engine results. Thanks to the simplicity and flexibility of the input format, results from a wide variety of search engines have been successfully viewed through the Web interface of this tool.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinProteomicsUser-Computer InterfaceMass SpectrometryPeptidesSearch EngineTandem Mass SpectrometryPeptides

Identifiers

PMID24591702
PMCPMC4014294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.