ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine
Integrative approaches for modeling regulation and function of the respiratory system.
Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The psychophysiology of the sigh: II: The sigh from the psychological perspective.Biological psychology · 2022Review
- Is our breathing optimal? Solving a piecewise linear model with constraints.Journal of mathematical biology · 2021Article
- Dynamical consequences of sensory feedback in a half-center oscillator coupled to a simple motor system.Biological cybernetics · 2021Article
- Relationship between cardiorespiratory phase coherence during hypoxia and genetic polymorphism in humans.The Journal of physiology · 2020Article
- Interplay Between Optimal Ventilation and Gas Transport in a Model of the Human Lung.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Article
- Eupnea, tachypnea, and autoresuscitation in a closed-loop respiratory control model.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- Computational models of the neural control of breathing.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2017Review
- Systems Medicine for Lung Diseases: Phenotypes and Precision Medicine in Cancer, Infection, and Allergy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2016Review
- Applying Biotechnology and Bioengineering to Pediatric Lung Disease: Emerging Paradigms and Platforms.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2015Review
- A closed-loop model of the respiratory system: focus on hypercapnia and active expiration.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mathematical models have been central to understanding the interaction between neural control and breathing. Models of the entire respiratory system-which comprises the lungs and the neural circuitry that controls their ventilation-have been derived using simplifying assumptions to compartmentalize each component of the system and to define the interactions between components. These full system models often rely-through necessity-on empirically derived relationships or parameters, in addition to physiological values. In parallel with the development of whole respiratory system models are mathematical models that focus on furthering a detailed understanding of the neural control network, or of the several functions that contribute to gas exchange within the lung. These models are biophysically based, and rely on physiological parameters. They include single-unit models for a breathing lung or neural circuit, through to spatially distributed models of ventilation and perfusion, or multicircuit models for neural control. The challenge is to bring together these more recent advances in models of neural control with models of lung function, into a full simulation for the respiratory system that builds upon the more detailed models but remains computationally tractable. This requires first understanding the mathematical models that have been developed for the respiratory system at different levels, and which could be used to study how physiological levels of O2 and CO2 in the blood are maintained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.