Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24590843›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2014

Multiple sex chromosomes in the light of female meiotic drive in amniote vertebrates.

Martina Pokorná, Marie Altmanová, Lukáš Kratochvíl

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Fast satellite DNA evolution in Nothobranchius annual killifishes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Sex chromosome evolution among amniotes: is the origin of sex chromosomes non-random?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Multiple sex chromosomes in teleost fishes from a cytogenetic perspective: state of the art and future challenges.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Expanding the classical paradigm: what we have learnt from vertebrates about sex chromosome evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Whole-chromosome fusions in the karyotype evolution ofPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. A brief review of vertebrate sex evolution with a pledge for integrative research: towards 'Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martina PokornáFaculty of Science, Department of Ecology, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, 128 44, Praha 2, Czech Republic, martina.pokorna@natur.cuni.cz.
Marie Altmanová
Lukáš Kratochvíl
Charles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is notable that the occurrence of multiple sex chromosomes differs significantly between major lineages of amniote vertebrates. In this respect, birds are especially conspicuous, as multiple sex chromosomes have not been observed in this lineage so far. On the other hand, in mammals, multiple sex chromosomes have evolved many times independently. We hypothesize that this contrast can be related to the different involvement of sex-specific sex chromosomes in female meiosis subjected to the female meiotic drive under male versus female heterogamety. Essentially, the male-specific Y chromosome is not involved in female meiosis and is therefore sheltered against the effects of the female meiotic drive affecting the X chromosome and autosomes. Conversely, the Z and W sex chromosomes are both present in female meiosis. Nonrandom segregation of these sex chromosomes as a consequence of their rearrangements connected with the emergence of multiple sex chromosomes would result in a biased sex ratio, which should be penalized by selection. Therefore, the emergence of multiple sex chromosomes should be less constrained in the lineages with male rather than female heterogamety. Our broader phylogenetic comparison across amniotes supports this prediction. We suggest that our results are consistent with the widespread occurrence of female meiotic drive in amniotes.

Indexed as

AnimalsBirdsChromosome SegregationFemaleInheritance PatternsMammalsMeiosisModels, GeneticPhylogenyReptilesSex Chromosomes

Identifiers

PMID24590843
OpenAlexW2031574681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.