ReviewDrugs2014
Pomalidomide: a review of its use in patients with recurrent multiple myeloma.
Review in Drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Chirality of New Drug Approvals (2013-2022): Trends and Perspectives.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Article
- Post-marketing safety of immunomodulatory drugs in multiple myeloma: A pharmacovigilance investigation based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Review
- A novel dual-cytokine-antibody fusion protein for the treatment of CD38-positive malignancies.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2018Article
- Phase I Study of Anti-GM2 Ganglioside Monoclonal Antibody BIW-8962 as Monotherapy in Patients with Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma.Oncology and therapy · 2016Article
- Assessment of Time-to-onset and Outcome of Lung Adverse Events With Pomalidomide from a Pharmacovigilance Study.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral pomalidomide (Imnovid® [EU]; Pomalyst® [USA]) in combination with dexamethasone (in the EU), is approved in several countries for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior therapies, including lenalidomide and bortezomib, and have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy (or progression within the last 60 days in the USA). The key therapeutic mechanisms of action of pomalidomide, a thalidomide analogue, reside in its immunomodulatory, antiproliferative and anti-angiogenic effects. In the pivotal, multinational phase II MM-002 and phase III MM-003 trials, pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone was effective and had a manageable safety and tolerability profile in adult patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who had received at least two prior antimyeloma therapies, including at least 2 cycles of both lenalidomide and bortezomib. Moreover, compared with high-dose dexamethasone, treatment with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone significantly prolonged progression-free survival, overall survival and time to disease progression, and improved overall response rates in the intent-to-treat population. In general, improvements in these clinical outcomes with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone treatment were also observed in subgroups of patients, including those refractory to lenalidomide, bortezomib or both drugs, those who had received several prior antimyeloma therapies, patients with renal impairment, elderly patients and those with a high-risk cytogenetic profile. Thus, combination therapy with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone is an important emerging treatment option for use as salvage therapy in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24590685What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.