SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2014
Combined oral contraceptives: venous thrombosis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers, 21 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
144 citing papers in PubMed, 21 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 393 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hemostatic safety profile of estetrol vs. ethinylestradiol in oral contraceptives: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2026Pooled it
- Contraceptive use among women with inflammatory bowel disease: An updated systematic review.Contraception · 2025Pooled it
- The efficacy of progestins in managing pain associated with endometriosis, fibroids and pre-menstrual syndrome: a systematic review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Pooled it
- [Preventive activities in women: PAPPS 2024 update].Atencion primaria · 2024Guideline
- Genome-wide investigation of exogenous female hormones, genetic variation, and venous thromboembolism risk.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2024Pooled it
- Are natural estrogens used in contraception at lower risk of venous thromboembolism than synthetic ones? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Pooled it
- Risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 who are using hormonal contraception: a Cochrane systematic review.BMJ sexual & reproductive health · 2023Pooled it
- Risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 who are using hormonal contraception.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Interventions for heavy menstrual bleeding; overview of Cochrane reviews and network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Association of Hormonal Contraceptive Use With Adverse Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses of Randomized Clinical Trials and Cohort Studies.JAMA network open · 2022Pooled it
- Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Transgender People Undergoing Hormone Feminizing Therapy: A Prevalence Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression Study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Pooled it
- Antiandrogen or estradiol treatment or both during hormone therapy in transitioning transgender women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Interventions commonly available during pandemics for heavy menstrual bleeding: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Guideline
- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Adverse Effects of Levonorgestrel Emergency Oral Contraceptive.Clinical drug investigation · 2020Pooled it
- Effect of age at first use of oral contraceptives on breast cancer risk: An updated meta-analysis.Medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Guideline
- A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analysis of screening interventions for assessing the risk of venous thromboembolism in women considering combined oral contraceptives.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2017Pooled it
- Nonoral combined hormonal contraceptives and thromboembolism: a systematic review.Contraception · 2017Pooled it
84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCombined oral contraceptive (COC) use has been associated with venous thrombosis (VT) (i.e., deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism). The VT risk has been evaluated for many estrogen doses and progestagen types contained in COC but no comprehensive comparison involving commonly used COC is available.
objectivesTo provide a comprehensive overview of the risk of venous thrombosis in women using different combined oral contraceptives. SEARCH
methodsElectronic databases (Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, CINAHL, Academic Search Premier and ScienceDirect) were searched in 22 April 2013 for eligible studies, without language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected studies including healthy women taking COC with VT as outcome. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcome of interest was a fatal or non-fatal first event of venous thrombosis with the main focus on deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Publications with at least 10 events in total were eligible. The network meta-analysis was performed using an extension of frequentist random effects models for mixed multiple treatment comparisons. Unadjusted relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were reported.Two independent reviewers extracted data from selected studies. MAIN
results3110 publications were retrieved through a search strategy; 25 publications reporting on 26 studies were included. Incidence of venous thrombosis in non-users from two included cohorts was 0.19 and 0.37 per 1 000 person years, in line with previously reported incidences of 0,16 per 1 000 person years. Use of combined oral contraceptives increased the risk of venous thrombosis compared with non-use (relative risk 3.5, 95% confidence interval 2.9 to 4.3). The relative risk of venous thrombosis for combined oral contraceptives with 30-35 μg ethinylestradiol and gestodene, desogestrel, cyproterone acetate, or drospirenone were similar and about 50-80% higher than for combined oral contraceptives with levonorgestrel. A dose related effect of ethinylestradiol was observed for gestodene, desogestrel, and levonorgestrel, with higher doses being associated with higher thrombosis risk. AUTHORS'
conclusionsAll combined oral contraceptives investigated in this analysis were associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis. The effect size depended both on the progestogen used and the dose of ethinylestradiol. Risk of venous thrombosis for combined oral contraceptives with 30-35 μg ethinylestradiol and gestodene, desogestrel, cyproterone acetate and drospirenone were similar, and about 50-80% higher than with levonorgestrel. The combined oral contraceptive with the lowest possible dose of ethinylestradiol and good compliance should be prescribed-that is, 30 μg ethinylestradiol with levonorgestrel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.