Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24590476›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2014

In vitro and in vivo studies of the biological activity of novel arylimidamides against Trypanosoma cruzi.

J S De Araújo, C F Da Silva, D G J Batista, P B Da Silva, M B Meuser, C A F Aiub, M F V da Silva, C F Araújo-Lima, M Banerjee, A A Farahat and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Antiplasmodial, Trypanocidal, and GenotoxicityPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Escaping ESKAPE resistance:Royal Society open science · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Repurposing Strategy of Atorvastatin against Trypanosoma cruzi:Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

J S De AraújoLaboratório de Biologia Celular, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
C F Da SilvaLaboratório de Biologia Celular, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
D G J BatistaLaboratório de Biologia Celular, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
P B Da SilvaLaboratório de Biologia Celular, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
M B MeuserLaboratório de Biologia Celular, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
C A F AiubDepartamento de Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto Biomédico, Departamento de Genética e Biologia Molecular, Laboratório de Genotoxicidade, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
M F V da SilvaDepartamento de Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto Biomédico, Departamento de Genética e Biologia Molecular, Laboratório de Genotoxicidade, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
C F Araújo-LimaDepartamento de Biofísica e Biometria, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
M BanerjeeDepartment of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
A A FarahatDepartment of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA Department of Pharmaceutical Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
C E StephensDepartment of Chemistry and Physics, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
A KumarDepartment of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
D W BoykinDepartment of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
M N C SoeiroLaboratório de Biologia Celular, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil soeiro@ioc.fiocruz.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fifteen novel arylimidamides (AIAs) (6 bis-amidino and 9 mono-amidino analogues) were assayed against Trypanosoma cruzi in vitro and in vivo. All the bis-AIAs were more effective than the mono-AIAs, and two analogues, DB1967 and DB1989, were further evaluated in vivo. Although both of them reduced parasitemia, protection against mortality was not achieved. Our results show that the number of amidino-terminal units affects the efficacy of arylimidamides against T. cruzi.

Indexed as

AmidinesAnimalsChagas DiseaseMaleMiceParasitemiaParasitic Sensitivity TestsTrypanocidal AgentsTrypanosoma cruziAmidinesTrypanocidal Agents

Identifiers

PMID24590476
PMCPMC4068551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.