Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24590429›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2014

PVA gel as a potential adhesion barrier: a safety study in a large animal model of intestinal surgery.

Bernhard W Renz, Kurt Leitner, Erich Odermatt, Daniel L Worthley, Martin K Angele, Karl-Walter Jauch, Reinhold A Lang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Biomaterials to Prevent Post-Operative Adhesion.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. The use of a novel adhesive tissue patch as an aid to anastomotic healing.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2018
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bernhard W RenzDepartment of Surgery, University of Munich-Campus Grosshadern, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Kurt Leitner
Erich Odermatt
Daniel L Worthley
Martin K Angele
Karl-Walter Jauch
Reinhold A Lang
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USAesculap (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntra-abdominal adhesions following surgery are a major source of morbidity and mortality including abdominal pain and small bowel obstruction. This study evaluated the safety of PVA gel (polyvinyl alcohol and carboxymethylated cellulose gel) on intestinal anastomoses and its potential effectiveness in preventing adhesions in a clinically relevant large animal model.

methodsExperiments were performed in a pig model with median laparotomy and intestinal anastomosis following small bowel resection. The primary endpoint was the safety of PVA on small intestinal anastomoses. We also measured the incidence of postoperative adhesions in PVA vs. control groups: group A (eight pigs): stapled anastomosis with PVA gel compared to group B (eight pigs), which had no PVA gel; group C (eight pigs): hand-sewn anastomosis with PVA gel compared to group B (eight pigs), which had no anti-adhesive barrier. Animals were sacrificed 14 days after surgery and analyzed.

resultsAll anastomoses had a patent lumen without any stenosis. No anastomoses leaked at an intraluminal pressure of 40 cmH2O. Thus, anastomoses healed very well in both groups, regardless of whether PVA was administered. PVA-treated animals, however, had significantly fewer adhesions in the area of stapled anastomoses. The hand-sewn PVA group also had weaker adhesions and trended towards fewer adhesions to adjacent organs.

conclusionThese results suggest that PVA gel does not jeopardize the integrity of intestinal anastomoses. However, larger trials are needed to investigate the potential of PVA gel to prevent adhesions in gastrointestinal surgery.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalAnimalsCarboxymethylcellulose SodiumDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGelsIntestine, SmallLaparotomyPolyvinyl AlcoholSuture TechniquesSwineTissue AdhesionsWound HealingCarboxymethylcellulose SodiumGelsPolyvinyl Alcohol

Identifiers

PMID24590429
OpenAlexW2037635285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.