Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24590363›Full record

Trial reportJAMA neurology2014

Population screening for variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease using a novel blood test: diagnostic accuracy and feasibility study.

Graham S Jackson, Jesse Burk-Rafel, Julie Ann Edgeworth, Anita Sicilia, Sabah Abdilahi, Justine Korteweg, Jonathan Mackey, Claire Thomas, Guosu Wang, Jonathan M Schott and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Variant CJD: Reflections a Quarter of a Century on.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Prion Diseases.Neurologic clinics · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Progressing a human embryonic stem-cell-based regenerative medicine therapy towards the clinic.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Graham S JacksonMRC Prion Unit, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, England.
Jesse Burk-RafelMRC Prion Unit, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, England2currently with University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Julie Ann EdgeworthMRC Prion Unit, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, England.
Anita SiciliaMRC Prion Unit, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, England.
Sabah AbdilahiMRC Prion Unit, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, England.
Justine KortewegMRC Prion Unit, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, England.
Jonathan MackeyMRC Prion Unit, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, England.
Claire ThomasMRC Prion Unit, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, England.
Guosu WangMRC Prion Unit, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, England.
Jonathan M SchottDementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, England.
Catherine MummeryDementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, England.
Patrick F ChinneryInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England.
Simon MeadMRC Prion Unit, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, England5National Prion Clinic, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, England.
John CollingeMRC Prion Unit, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, England5National Prion Clinic, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, England.
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBUniversity College London · GBMRC Prion Unit · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_U123170362Medical Research Council MC_U123192748Wellcome Trust 084980/Z/08/ZWellcome Trust 096919Wellcome Trust 101876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceOur study indicates a prototype blood-based variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) assay has sufficient sensitivity and specificity to justify a large study comparing vCJD prevalence in the United Kingdom with a bovine spongiform encephalopathy-unexposed population. In a clinical diagnostic capacity, the assay's likelihood ratios dramatically change an individual's pretest disease odds to posttest probabilities and can confirm vCJD infection.

objectivesTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of a prototype blood test for vCJD and hence its suitability for clinical use and for screening prion-exposed populations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsRetrospective, cross-sectional diagnostic study of blood samples from national blood collection and prion disease centers in the United States and United Kingdom. Anonymized samples were representative of the US blood donor population (n = 5000), healthy UK donors (n = 200), patients with nonprion neurodegenerative diseases (n = 352), patients in whom a prion disease diagnosis was likely (n = 105), and patients with confirmed vCJD (n = 10). MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: Presence of vCJD infection determined by a prototype test (now in clinical diagnostic use) that captures, enriches, and detects disease-associated prion protein from whole blood using stainless steel powder.

resultsThe assay's specificity among the presumed negative American donor samples was 100% (95% CI, 99.93%-100%) and was confirmed in a healthy UK cohort (100% specificity; 95% CI, 98.2%-100%). Of potentially cross-reactive blood samples from patients with nonprion neurodegenerative diseases, no samples tested positive (100% specificity; 95% CI, 98.9%-100%). Among National Prion Clinic referrals in whom a prion disease diagnosis was likely, 2 patients with sporadic CJD tested positive (98.1% specificity; 95% CI, 93.3%-99.8%). Finally, we reconfirmed but could not refine our previous sensitivity estimate in a small blind panel of samples from unaffected individuals and patients with vCJD (70% sensitivity; 95% CI, 34.8%-93.3%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In conjunction with the assay's established high sensitivity (71.4%; 95% CI, 47.8%-88.7%), the extremely high specificity supports using the assay to screen for vCJD infection in prion-exposed populations. Additionally, the lack of cross-reactivity and false positives in a range of nonprion neurodegenerative diseases supports the use of the assay in patient diagnosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleCohort StudiesCreutzfeldt-Jakob SyndromeCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesHematologic TestsHumansPopulation SurveillancePrion DiseasesRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24590363
PMCPMC4158718
OpenAlexW2079622150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.