Trial reportJAMA neurology2014
Population screening for variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease using a novel blood test: diagnostic accuracy and feasibility study.
Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Variant CJD: Reflections a Quarter of a Century on.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Detection of Pathognomonic Biomarker PrPBiomolecules · 2020Review
- PMCA Applications for Prion Detection in Peripheral Tissues of Patients with Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease.Biomolecules · 2020Review
- Preclinical Detection of Prions in Blood of Nonhuman Primates Infected with Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease.Emerging infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Challenges and Advances in Antemortem Diagnosis of Human Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Prion Diseases.Neurologic clinics · 2018Review
- Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease lookback study: 21 years of surveillance for transfusion transmission risk.Transfusion · 2017Article
- Prion disease: experimental models and reality.Acta neuropathologica · 2017Review
- Diagnosing Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease by the Detection of Abnormal Prion Protein in Patient Urine.JAMA neurology · 2016Article
- Antemortem Detection of Chronic Wasting Disease Prions in Nasal Brush Collections and Rectal Biopsy Specimens from White-Tailed Deer by Real-Time Quaking-Induced Conversion.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
- Current concepts in the prevention of pathogen transmission via blood/plasma-derived products for bleeding disorders.Blood reviews · 2016Review
- Preclinical detection of infectivity and disease-specific PrP in blood throughout the incubation period of prion disease.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Progressing a human embryonic stem-cell-based regenerative medicine therapy towards the clinic.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015Review
- Recent US Case of Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease-Global Implications.Emerging infectious diseases · 2015Article
- On the dark side of therapies with immunoglobulin concentrates: the adverse events.Frontiers in immunology · 2015Review
- First demonstration of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy-associated prion protein (PrPTSE) in extracellular vesicles from plasma of mice infected with mouse-adapted variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by in vitro amplification.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2014Article
- Preclinical detection of variant CJD and BSE prions in blood.PLoS pathogens · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
importanceOur study indicates a prototype blood-based variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) assay has sufficient sensitivity and specificity to justify a large study comparing vCJD prevalence in the United Kingdom with a bovine spongiform encephalopathy-unexposed population. In a clinical diagnostic capacity, the assay's likelihood ratios dramatically change an individual's pretest disease odds to posttest probabilities and can confirm vCJD infection.
objectivesTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of a prototype blood test for vCJD and hence its suitability for clinical use and for screening prion-exposed populations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsRetrospective, cross-sectional diagnostic study of blood samples from national blood collection and prion disease centers in the United States and United Kingdom. Anonymized samples were representative of the US blood donor population (n = 5000), healthy UK donors (n = 200), patients with nonprion neurodegenerative diseases (n = 352), patients in whom a prion disease diagnosis was likely (n = 105), and patients with confirmed vCJD (n = 10). MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: Presence of vCJD infection determined by a prototype test (now in clinical diagnostic use) that captures, enriches, and detects disease-associated prion protein from whole blood using stainless steel powder.
resultsThe assay's specificity among the presumed negative American donor samples was 100% (95% CI, 99.93%-100%) and was confirmed in a healthy UK cohort (100% specificity; 95% CI, 98.2%-100%). Of potentially cross-reactive blood samples from patients with nonprion neurodegenerative diseases, no samples tested positive (100% specificity; 95% CI, 98.9%-100%). Among National Prion Clinic referrals in whom a prion disease diagnosis was likely, 2 patients with sporadic CJD tested positive (98.1% specificity; 95% CI, 93.3%-99.8%). Finally, we reconfirmed but could not refine our previous sensitivity estimate in a small blind panel of samples from unaffected individuals and patients with vCJD (70% sensitivity; 95% CI, 34.8%-93.3%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In conjunction with the assay's established high sensitivity (71.4%; 95% CI, 47.8%-88.7%), the extremely high specificity supports using the assay to screen for vCJD infection in prion-exposed populations. Additionally, the lack of cross-reactivity and false positives in a range of nonprion neurodegenerative diseases supports the use of the assay in patient diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.