SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014
No association between XRCC1 gene Arg194Trp polymorphism and risk of lung cancer: evidence based on an updated cumulative meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- T1 polymorphism in a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 33 (ADAM33) gene may contribute to the risk of childhood asthma in Asians.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2017Pooled it
- Tumor necrosis factor-α G-308A (rs1800629) polymorphism and aggressive periodontitis susceptibility: a meta-analysis of 16 case-control studies.Scientific reports · 2016Pooled it
- Article
- Note of clarification of data in the paper titled X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 codon 399 polymorphism and lung cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015Article
- Note of clarification of data in the paper entitled no association between XRCC1 gene Arg194Trp polymorphism and risk of lung cancer: evidence based on an updated cumulative meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015Article
- The relationship between genetic variants of XRCC1 gene and lung cancer susceptibility in Chinese Han population.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2014Article
- Impact of polymorphisms of the DNA repair gene XRCC1 and their role in the risk of prostate cancer.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) gene Arg194Trp polymorphism has been reported to be associated with risk of lung cancer in many published studies. Nevertheless, the research results were inconclusive and conflicting. To reach conclusive results, several meta-analysis studies were conducted by combining results from literature reports through pooling analysis. However, these previous meta-analysis studies were still not consistent. Hence, we used an updated and cumulative meta-analysis to get a more comprehensive and precise result from 25 case-control studies searching through the PubMed database up to September 1, 2013. The meta-analysis was carried out by the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software and the odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate the pooled effect. The result involving 8,876 lung cancer patients and 11,210 controls revealed that XRCC1 Arg194Trp polymorphism was not associated with lung cancer risk [(OR=0.97, 95 %CI=0.92-1.03) for Trp vs. Arg; (OR=0.92, 95 % CI=0.85-0.98) for ArgTrp vs. ArgArg; (OR=1.07, 95 % CI=0.92-1.23) for TrpTrp vs. ArgArg; (OR=0.93, 95 % CI=0.87-1.00) for (TrpTrp + ArgTrp) vs. ArgArg; and (OR=1.08, 95 % CI=0.94-1.25) for TrpTrp vs. (ArgTrp + ArgArg)]. The cumulative meta-analysis showed that the results maintained the same, while the ORs with 95 % CI were more stable with the accumulation of case-control studies. The sensitivity and subgroups analyses showed that the results were robust and not affected by any single study with no publication bias. Relevant studies might not be needed for supporting these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.