Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24590245›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2014

Explaining microbial genomic diversity in light of evolutionary ecology.

Otto X Cordero, Martin F Polz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 172 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
172citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

172 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The Complete Genomes ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Genomic and phenotypic insights into Serratia interaction with plants from an ecological perspective.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Role of horizontal gene transfer and cooperation in rhizosphere microbiome assembly.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

112 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Otto X CorderoDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH-Zürich), CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Martin F PolzDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139-4307, USA.

Funding

TOXICOLOGY CORE UNITP30ES002109 · NIEHS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LEVINE, STUART S · 1985 to 2020
$25.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30‑ES002109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparisons of closely related microorganisms have shown that individual genomes can be highly diverse in terms of gene content. In this Review, we discuss several studies showing that much of this variation is associated with social and ecological interactions, which have an important role in the population biology of wild populations of bacteria and archaea. These interactions create frequency-dependent selective pressures that can either stabilize gene frequencies at intermediate levels in populations or promote fast gene turnover, which presents as low gene frequencies in genome surveys. Thus, interpretation of gene-content diversity requires the delineation of populations according to cohesive gene flow and ecology, as micro-evolutionary changes arise in response to local selection pressures and population dynamics.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaBiodiversityBiological EvolutionEcosystemGenetic VariationMicrobial InteractionsArchaeaBacteriaSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID24590245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.