Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24590203›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2014

Effect of corn steep liquor (CSL) and cassava wastewater (CW) on chitin and chitosan production by Cunninghamella elegans and their physicochemical characteristics and cytotoxicity.

Lúcia Raquel Ramos Berger, Thayza Christina Montenegro Stamford, Thatiana Montenegro Stamford-Arnaud, Luciana de Oliveira Franco, Aline Elesbão do Nascimento, Horacinna M de M Cavalcante, Rui Oliveira Macedo, Galba Maria de Campos-Takaki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Chitinase production by Trichoderma koningiopsis UFSMQ40 using solid state fermentation.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lúcia Raquel Ramos BergerPost-Graduate Program in Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670420, PE, Brazil. quelberger@hotmail.com.
Thayza Christina Montenegro StamfordDepartment of Tropical Medicine, Center of Health Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670420, PE, Brazil. thayzastamford@yahoo.com.br.
Thatiana Montenegro Stamford-ArnaudDepartment of Tropical Medicine, Center of Health Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife 50670420, PE, Brazil. thayzastamford@yahoo.com.br.
Luciana de Oliveira FrancoCenter of Biology Sciences, Department of Microbiology, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife 52171900, PE, Brazil. lucianafranco@terra.com.br.
Aline Elesbão do NascimentoNucleus of Research in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, Catholic University of Pernambuco, Recife 50050590, PE, Brazil. elesbao@unicap.br.
Horacinna M de M CavalcanteDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Paraíba-UFPB, João Pessoa 58051-900, PB, Brazil. horacinnammc@yahoo.com.br.
Rui Oliveira MacedoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Paraíba-UFPB, João Pessoa 58051-900, PB, Brazil. ruimacedo@ccs.ufpb.br.
Galba Maria de Campos-TakakiNucleus of Research in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, Catholic University of Pernambuco, Recife 50050590, PE, Brazil. galba_takaki@yahoo.com.br.
Universidade Católica de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiological processes were used for chitin and chitosan production with Cunninghamella elegans UCP/WFCC 0542 grown in different concentrations of two agro-industrial wastes, corn steep liquor (CSL) and cassava wastewater (CW) established using a 2² full factorial design. The polysaccharides were extracted by alkali-acid treatment and characterized by infrared spectroscopy, viscosity, thermal analysis, elemental analysis, scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. The cytotoxicity of chitosan was evaluated for signs of vascular change on the chorioallantoic membrane of chicken eggs. The highest biomass (9.93 g/L) was obtained in trial 3 (5% CW, 8% CSL), the greatest chitin and chitosan yields were 89.39 mg/g and 57.82 mg/g, respectively, and both were obtained in trial 2 (10% CW, 4% CSL). Chitin and chitosan showed a degree of deacetylation of 40.98% and 88.24%, and a crystalline index of 35.80% and 23.82%, respectively, and chitosan showed low molecular weight (LMW 5.2 × 10³ Da). Chitin and chitosan can be considered non-irritating, due to the fact they do not promote vascular change. It was demonstrated that CSL and CW are effective renewable agroindustrial alternative substrates for the production of chitin and chitosan.

Indexed as

WastewaterAnimalsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiomassCaenorhabditis elegansChitinChitosanCulture MediaCunninghamellaManihotThermodynamicsViscosityZea maysChitinChitosanCulture MediaWastewater

Identifiers

PMID24590203
PMCPMC6271803
OpenAlexW1981306753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.