Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24589310›Full record

Trial reportScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2014

Dose reduction in whole-body computed tomography of multiple injuries (DoReMI): protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Dirk Stengel, Caspar Ottersbach, Thomas Kahl, Constanze Nikulka, Claas Güthoff, Thomas Hartel, Sophia Hünnebeck, Axel Ekkernkamp, Sven Mutze

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Editorial: facts, figures and the future.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2015
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dirk StengelCentre for Clinical Research, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin Trauma Centre, Warener Str, 7, Berlin 12683, Germany. dirk.stengel@ukb.de.
Caspar Ottersbach
Thomas Kahl
Constanze Nikulka
Claas Güthoff
Thomas Hartel
Sophia Hünnebeck
Axel Ekkernkamp
Sven Mutze

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle-pass, contrast-enhanced whole body multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) emerged as the diagnostic standard for evaluating patients with major trauma. Modern iterative image algorithms showed high image quality at a much lower radiation dose in the non-trauma setting. This study aims at investigating whether the radiation dose can safely be reduced in trauma patients without compromising the diagnostic accuracy and image quality. METHODS/

designProspective observational study with two consecutive cohorts of patients.

settingA high-volume, academic, supra-regional trauma centre in Germany. STUDY POPULATION: Consecutive male and female patients who 1. had been exposed to a high-velocity trauma mechanism, 2. present with clinical evidence or high suspicion of multiple trauma (predicted Injury Severity Score [ISS] ≥16) and 3. are scheduled for primary MDCT based on the decision of the trauma leader on call.Imaging protocols: In a before/after design, a consecutive series of 500 patients will undergo single-pass, whole-body 128-row multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) with a standard, as low as possible radiation dose. This will be followed by a consecutive series of 500 patients undergoing an approved ultra-low dose MDCT protocol using an image processing algorithm. DATA: Routine administrative data and electronic patient records, as well as digital images stored in a picture archiving and communications system will serve as the primary data source. The protocol was approved by the institutional review board. MAIN OUTCOMES: (1) incidence of delayed diagnoses, (2) diagnostic accuracy, as correlated to the reference standard of a synopsis of all subsequent clinical, imaging, surgical and autopsy findings, (3) patients' safety, (4) radiation exposure (e.g. effective dose), (5) subjective image quality (assessed independently radiologists and trauma surgeons on a 100-mm visual analogue scale), (6) objective image quality (e.g., contrast-to-noise ratio). ANALYSIS: Multivariate regression will be employed to adjust and correct the findings for time and cohort effects. An exploratory interim analysis halfway after introduction of low-dose MDCT will be conducted to assess whether this protocol is clearly inferior or superior to the current standard. DISCUSSION: Although non-experimental, this study will generate first large-scale data on the utility of imaging-enhancing algorithms in whole-body MDCT for major blunt trauma.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN74557102.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMultidetector Computed TomographyMultiple TraumaPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRadiation InjuriesReproducibility of ResultsSafetyTrauma Severity IndicesWhole Body Imaging

Identifiers

PMID24589310
PMCPMC3973884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.