Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24589151›Full record

Trial reportJournal of translational medicine2014

Results of a phase I/II clinical trial: standardized, non-xenogenic, cultivated limbal stem cell transplantation.

Nadia Zakaria, Tine Possemiers, Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill, Inge Leysen, Jos Rozema, Carina Koppen, Jean-Pierre Timmermans, Zwi Berneman, Marie-Jose Tassignon

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of translational medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02148016 phase1 / phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Corneal Epithelium Repair and Therapy Using Autologous Limbal Stem Cell Transplantation

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2012 to 2014Enrolled30ConditionsCorneal Disease, Pterygium, Myopia, HyperopiaArmsLSCs and amniotic membrane (Modified Technique), Amniotic membrane only (Traditional Technique), PRK, LSCs, and amniotic membrane (Modified Technique), PRK only (Traditional Technique), Levofloxacin
NCT02318485 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Translational Stem Cell Research in Ophthalmology - Regenerating the Anterior Cornea Through Standardized Transplantation of Limbal Epithelial Stem Cells: a Phase II Multicenter Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AntwerpRan2015 to 2024Enrolled27ConditionsLimbal Stem Cell DeficiencyArmsLimbal epithelial stem cell graft
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Regenerative therapy for the Cornea.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2022
    Review
  18. Regulation of Limbal Epithelial Stem Cells: Importance of the Niche.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nadia ZakariaCentre for Cell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem 2650, Belgium. Nadia.Zakaria@uza.be.
Tine Possemiers
Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill
Inge Leysen
Jos Rozema
Carina Koppen
Jean-Pierre Timmermans
Zwi Berneman
Marie-Jose Tassignon
Antwerp University Hospital · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo determine if a standardized, non-xenogenic, reduced manipulation cultivation and surgical transplantation of limbal stem cell grafts is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with total and partial limbal stem cell deficiency.

methodsIn vitro cellular outgrowth and phenotype of the limbal epithelial cell and composite grafts were validated using a new protocol. Patients received either autologous (n = 15) or allogenic (n = 3) explants cultured using a standardized protocol free from xenogenic products. The resulting grafts were transplanted using a reduced manipulation surgical technique.

resultsThe majority of cells (>50%) displayed a progenitor phenotype typified by positive immunofluorescence for ∆Np63, CK14 and ABCG2 and low immunofluorescence for CK3/12 and desmoglein 3 proteins. The surgical protocol was designed to minimize manipulation and the graft itself was secured without sutures. The transplant recipients were followed for a mean of 24 months. Twelve of the 18 transplant recipients were graded as anatomically successful (67%), based on the defined success parameters. There was a significant reduction in corneal neovascularization, which was accompanied by an improvement in pain though not photophobia or central corneal opacity post transplant. The transplantation protocol showed no measureable effect on visual acuity.

conclusionWe conclude that this standardized culture system and surgical approach is safe and effective in reducing corneal neovascularization. The technique is free from animal contaminants and maintains a large proportion of progenitor cells. Although this technique did not improve visual function, restoring a functional epithelial cell layer and reducing corneal neovascularization provides an improved platform for a penetrating keratoplasty to ultimately improve visual function.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationAdolescentAdultAgedAmnionAnimalsCell ProliferationCells, CulturedChildCorneal DiseasesEpithelial CellsFemaleFlow CytometryHumansLimbus CorneaeMale

Identifiers

PMID24589151
PMCPMC3996015
OpenAlexW2169020624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.