Trial reportJournal of translational medicine2014
Results of a phase I/II clinical trial: standardized, non-xenogenic, cultivated limbal stem cell transplantation.
Trial report in Journal of translational medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Corneal Epithelium Repair and Therapy Using Autologous Limbal Stem Cell Transplantation
Translational Stem Cell Research in Ophthalmology - Regenerating the Anterior Cornea Through Standardized Transplantation of Limbal Epithelial Stem Cells: a Phase II Multicenter Trial
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of clinical research on regenerative medicine for the cornea.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis investigating autograft versus allograft cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation in limbal stem cell deficiency.International ophthalmology · 2019Pooled it
- Diagnostic criteria for limbal stem cell deficiency before surgical intervention-A systematic literature review and analysis.Survey of ophthalmologyPooled it
- Clinical outcomes of xeno-free expansion and transplantation of autologous ocular surface epithelial stem cells via contact lens delivery: a prospective case series.Stem cell research & therapy · 2015Trial
- Stem Cell Therapy for Corneal Epithelium Regeneration following Good Manufacturing and Clinical Procedures.BioMed research international · 2015Trial
- Clinical translational research on stem cell products: prospects and challenges.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Progenitor cells from limbal, conjunctival and oral mucosal biopsies cultivated on silicone hydrogel contact lenses share CD90, CK15, nestin, CXCR4 and SDF-1 niche markers but preserve tissue-specific characteristics and differentiation directions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Induced pluripotent stem-cell-derived corneal epithelium for transplant surgery: a single-arm, open-label, first-in-human interventional study in Japan.Lancet (London, England) · 2024Article
- Bio-printing method as a novel approach to obtain a fibrin scaffold settled by limbal epithelial cells for corneal regeneration.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Beyond Vision: An Overview of Regenerative Medicine and Its Current Applications in Ophthalmological Care.Cells · 2024Review
- WNT16b promotes the proliferation and self-renewal of human limbal epithelial stem/progenitor cells via activating the calcium/calcineurin A/NFATC2 pathway.Cell proliferation · 2023Article
- Article
- Potency assays and biomarkers for cell-based advanced therapy medicinal products.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Limbal epithelial stem cell sheets from young donors have better regenerative potential.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Long-term survival in non-human primates of stem cell-derived, MHC-unmatched corneal epithelial cell sheets.Stem cell reports · 2022Article
- Cultivated Autologous Limbal Epithelial Cell Transplantation: New Frontier in the Treatment of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency.American journal of ophthalmology · 2022Review
- Regenerative therapy for the Cornea.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2022Review
- Regulation of Limbal Epithelial Stem Cells: Importance of the Niche.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Human limbal epithelial stem cell regulation, bioengineering and function.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2021Review
- Goals and Challenges of Stem Cell-Based Therapy for Corneal Blindness Due to Limbal Deficiency.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo determine if a standardized, non-xenogenic, reduced manipulation cultivation and surgical transplantation of limbal stem cell grafts is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with total and partial limbal stem cell deficiency.
methodsIn vitro cellular outgrowth and phenotype of the limbal epithelial cell and composite grafts were validated using a new protocol. Patients received either autologous (n = 15) or allogenic (n = 3) explants cultured using a standardized protocol free from xenogenic products. The resulting grafts were transplanted using a reduced manipulation surgical technique.
resultsThe majority of cells (>50%) displayed a progenitor phenotype typified by positive immunofluorescence for ∆Np63, CK14 and ABCG2 and low immunofluorescence for CK3/12 and desmoglein 3 proteins. The surgical protocol was designed to minimize manipulation and the graft itself was secured without sutures. The transplant recipients were followed for a mean of 24 months. Twelve of the 18 transplant recipients were graded as anatomically successful (67%), based on the defined success parameters. There was a significant reduction in corneal neovascularization, which was accompanied by an improvement in pain though not photophobia or central corneal opacity post transplant. The transplantation protocol showed no measureable effect on visual acuity.
conclusionWe conclude that this standardized culture system and surgical approach is safe and effective in reducing corneal neovascularization. The technique is free from animal contaminants and maintains a large proportion of progenitor cells. Although this technique did not improve visual function, restoring a functional epithelial cell layer and reducing corneal neovascularization provides an improved platform for a penetrating keratoplasty to ultimately improve visual function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.