Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24588670›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2014

An arranged marriage for precision medicine: hypoxia and genomic assays in localized prostate cancer radiotherapy.

R G Bristow, A Berlin, A Dal Pra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A GdWMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. HIF1 and ID1 Interplay Confers Adaptive Survival to HIF1α-Inhibition.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The changing paradigm of tumour response to irradiation.The British journal of radiology · 2017
    Review
  17. Molecular mechanisms of hypoxia in cancer.Clinical and translational imaging · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R G BristowPrincess Margaret Cancer Center (University Health Network), Toronto, ON, Canada.
A Berlin
A Dal Pra

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (CaP) is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in males in the Western world with one in six males diagnosed in their lifetime. Current clinical prognostication groupings use pathologic Gleason score, pre-treatment prostatic-specific antigen and Union for International Cancer Control-TNM staging to place patients with localized CaP into low-, intermediate- and high-risk categories. These categories represent an increasing risk of biochemical failure and CaP-specific mortality rates, they also reflect the need for increasing treatment intensity and justification for increased side effects. In this article, we point out that 30-50% of patients will still fail image-guided radiotherapy or surgery despite the judicious use of clinical risk categories owing to interpatient heterogeneity in treatment response. To improve treatment individualization, better predictors of prognosis and radiotherapy treatment response are needed to triage patients to bespoke and intensified CaP treatment protocols. These should include the use of pre-treatment genomic tests based on DNA or RNA indices and/or assays that reflect cancer metabolism, such as hypoxia assays, to define patient-specific CaP progression and aggression. More importantly, it is argued that these novel prognostic assays could be even more useful if combined together to drive forward precision cancer medicine for localized CaP.

Indexed as

Chromosomal InstabilityGenetic TestingHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingOxygen ConsumptionPrognosisProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRisk FactorsProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID24588670
PMCPMC4064607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.