Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24588547›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2014

The marine diversity spectrum.

Daniel C Reuman, Henrik Gislason, Carolyn Barnes, Frédéric Mélin, Simon Jennings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Community heterogeneity scaling of gut microbiomes across Chinese ethnicities and lifestyles appears invariant.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Power law analysis of the human milk microbiome.Archives of microbiology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Spatial heterogeneity analysis of the human virome with Taylor's power law.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel C ReumanDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK.
Henrik GislasonTechnical University of Denmark, Charlottenlund Slot, DK-2920, Charlottenlund, Denmark.
Carolyn BarnesCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 OHT, UK.
Frédéric MélinEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, 21027, Ispra (VA), Italy.
Simon JenningsCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 OHT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distributions of species body sizes within a taxonomic group, for example, mammals, are widely studied and important because they help illuminate the evolutionary processes that produced these distributions. Distributions of the sizes of species within an assemblage delineated by geography instead of taxonomy (all the species in a region regardless of clade) are much less studied but are equally important and will illuminate a different set of ecological and evolutionary processes. We develop and test a mechanistic model of how diversity varies with body mass in marine ecosystems. The model predicts the form of the 'diversity spectrum', which quantifies the distribution of species' asymptotic body masses, is a species analogue of the classic size spectrum of individuals, and which we have found to be a new and widely applicable description of diversity patterns. The marine diversity spectrum is predicted to be approximately linear across an asymptotic mass range spanning seven orders of magnitude. Slope -0.5 is predicted for the global marine diversity spectrum for all combined pelagic zones of continental shelf seas, and slopes for large regions are predicted to lie between -0.5 and -0.1. Slopes of -0.5 and -0.1 represent markedly different communities: a slope of -0.5 depicts a 10-fold reduction in diversity for every 100-fold increase in asymptotic mass; a slope of -0.1 depicts a 1.6-fold reduction. Steeper slopes are predicted for larger or colder regions, meaning fewer large species per small species for such regions. Predictions were largely validated by a global empirical analysis. Results explain for the first time a new and widespread phenomenon of biodiversity. Results have implications for estimating numbers of species of small asymptotic mass, where taxonomic inventories are far from complete. Results show that the relationship between diversity and body mass can be explained from the dependence of predation behaviour, dispersal, and life history on body mass, and a neutral assumption about speciation and extinction.

Indexed as

BiodiversityAnimalsAquatic OrganismsBody SizeEcosystemInvertebratesModels, BiologicalOceans and SeasSpecies SpecificityVertebratesbiodiversitybody masscommunityneutral theorypower lawsize spectrum

Identifiers

PMID24588547
PMCPMC4286008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.