ReviewClinical genetics2014
Biobanks and personalized medicine.
Review in Clinical genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical Epidemiological Studies of Colorectal Cancer by Record Linkage of Cancer Registries and Biospecimen Data: A Systematic Review.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Pooled it
- Assessment of biobank awareness among medical students in Iran.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- Building a Decentralized Biobanking App for Research Transparency and Patient Engagement: Participatory Design Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Healthcare professionals and scientists' collaboration with biobanks: a pilot study on the assessment of knowledge and attitudes toward biospecimen donation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Delta-S-Cys-Albumin as a Marker of Pediatric Biospecimen Integrity.Biopreservation and biobanking · 2024Article
- When Biobanks Meet Religion: Association Between Religiosity and Attitudes of Polish Medical Students Toward Biobanking of Human Biological Material for Research Purposes.Journal of religion and health · 2024Article
- Cohort Profile Update: Mental Health Online Survey in the Estonian Biobank (EstBB MHoS).International journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Do biobanks need pharmacists? Support of pharmacy students to biobanking of human biological material for pharmaceutical research and development.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Establishing a Pregnancy Lyme Disease Biobank.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Impact of ultra-low temperature storage on serum sIgE detection and allergic disease biobank feasibility.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Developing cancer biobanks in Romania: understanding the knowledge and recommendations in assessing a clinical dataset for biospecimens.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2023Article
- To donate or not to donate? Future healthcare professionals' opinions on biobanking of human biological material for research purposes.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- Dynamic Biobanking for Advancing Breast Cancer Research.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Assessment of Biobanking Knowledge and Attitudes towards Biospecimen Donation among Healthcare Providers in Saudi Arabia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Ethical, legal and social/societal implications (ELSI) of recall-by-genotype (RbG) and genotype-driven-research (GDR) approaches: a scoping review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2022Article
- Better governance starts with better words: why responsible human tissue research demands a change of language.BMC medical ethics · 2022Article
- A scoping review of considerations and practices for benefit sharing in biobanking.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- The landscape of biobanks in Poland-characteristics of Polish biobanking units at the beginning of BBMRI.pl organization.Journal of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Governing Personalized Health: A Scoping Review.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Biobanking in health care: evolution and future directions.Journal of translational medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We provide a mini-review of how biobanks can support clinical genetics in the era of personalized medicine. We discuss types of biobanks, including disease specific and general biobanks not focused on one disease. We present considerations in setting up a biobank, including consenting and governance, biospecimens, risk factor and related data, informatics, and linkage to electronic health records for phenotyping. We also discuss the uses of biobanks and ongoing considerations, including genotype-driven recruitment, investigations of gene-environment associations, and the re-use of data generated from studies. Finally, we present a brief discussion of some of the unresolved issues, such as return of research results and sustaining biobanks over time. In summary, carefully designed biobanks can provide critical research and infrastructure support for clinical genetics in the era of personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.